Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KLAR vs AFRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
KLAR vs AFRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $5.39B | $21.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.00B | $3.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-279M | $282M |
| Gross Margin | 63.1% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | -8.2% | 6.2% |
| Forward P/E | 570.5x | 62.5x |
| Total Debt | $791M | $7.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.24B | $1.35B |
Quick Verdict: KLAR vs AFRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KLAR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.46
- Lower volatility, beta 2.46, Low D/E 35.0%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 2.46, current ratio 1.21x
AFRM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 109.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.7%
- -32.6% 10Y total return vs KLAR's -68.8%
- 38.8% revenue growth vs KLAR's 21.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.8% revenue growth vs KLAR's 21.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (62.5x vs 570.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.6% margin vs KLAR's -9.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.46 vs AFRM's 2.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.6% vs KLAR's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs KLAR's -1.3%, ROIC -0.7% vs -218.7% |
KLAR vs AFRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KLAR vs AFRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AFRM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AFRM and KLAR operate at a comparable scale, with $3.7B and $3.0B in trailing revenue. AFRM is the more profitable business, keeping 7.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KLAR's -9.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | $495M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$279M | $282M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.2B | $619M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.1% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +6.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +105.1% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +29.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +60.9% |
Valuation Metrics
KLAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 437.2x trailing earnings, AFRM trades at a 80% valuation discount to KLAR's 2132.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KLAR's 43.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 205.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $21.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $28.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2132.84x | 437.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 570.54x | 62.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 43.22x | 205.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.02x | 6.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.31x | 7.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.95x | 36.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AFRM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AFRM delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-11 for KLAR. KLAR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFRM's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KLAR scores 7/9 vs AFRM's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.3% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.2% | -0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.0% | -0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 2.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.5B | $6.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $791M | $7.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.15x | 1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AFRM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AFRM five years ago would be worth $12,046 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,119 for KLAR. Over the past 12 months, AFRM leads with a +28.6% total return vs KLAR's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFRM at 76.4% vs KLAR's -32.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -50.0% | -11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -68.8% | +28.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.8% | +449.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.8% | +20.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.8% | -32.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.2% | +76.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KLAR and AFRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KLAR is the less volatile stock with a 2.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFRM's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFRM currently trades 65.6% from its 52-week high vs KLAR's 25.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.46x | 2.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.20 | $100.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.06 | $42.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.0% | +65.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KLAR as "Buy" and AFRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 73.8% upside for KLAR (target: $25) vs 23.2% for AFRM (target: $81).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.83 | $80.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% |
AFRM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KLAR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KLAR vs AFRM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KLAR or AFRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) is the stronger pick with 38. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 2% for Klarna Group plc (KLAR). Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) offers the better valuation at 437. 2x trailing P/E (62. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Klarna Group plc (KLAR) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KLAR or AFRM?
On trailing P/E, Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) is the cheapest at 437. 2x versus Klarna Group plc at 2132. 8x. On forward P/E, Affirm Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 62. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KLAR or AFRM?
Over the past 5 years, Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) delivered a total return of +20. 5%, compared to -68. 8% for Klarna Group plc (KLAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AFRM returned -30. 7% versus KLAR's -67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KLAR or AFRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Klarna Group plc (KLAR) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
46β versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AFRM is approximately 11% more volatile than KLAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Klarna Group plc (KLAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 3% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KLAR or AFRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) is pulling ahead at 38. 8% versus 21. 2% for Klarna Group plc (KLAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affirm Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 109. 0% year-over-year, compared to 101. 0% for Klarna Group plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AFRM leads at 33. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KLAR or AFRM?
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus 0. 1% for Klarna Group plc — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AFRM leads at -2. 7% versus -4. 5% for KLAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KLAR leads at 77. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KLAR or AFRM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) trades at 62. 5x forward P/E versus 570. 5x for Klarna Group plc — 508. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KLAR: 73. 8% to $24. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — KLAR or AFRM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KLAR or AFRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Klarna Group plc (KLAR) carries a higher beta of 2. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AFRM: -30. 7%, KLAR: -67. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KLAR and AFRM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.