Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AFRM vs SEZL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.44B
5Y Perf.-32.4%
SEZL
Sezzle Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.36B
5Y Perf.+75.1%

AFRM vs SEZL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AFRM logoAFRM
SEZL logoSEZL
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$22.44B$3.36B
Revenue (TTM)$3.20B$450M
Net Income (TTM)$382M$148M
Gross Margin62.6%85.4%
Operating Margin10.2%39.3%
Forward P/E62.5x21.2x
Total Debt$7.85B$141M
Cash & Equiv.$1.35B$64M

AFRM vs SEZLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AFRM
SEZL
StockJan 21May 26Return
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)10067.6-32.4%
Sezzle Inc. (SEZL)100175.1+75.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AFRM vs SEZL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SEZL leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Angle

In this particular matchup, AFRM is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.

Best for: technology exposure
SEZL
Sezzle Inc.
The Banking Pick

SEZL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 2.39
  • Rev growth 66.1%, EPS growth 69.9%
  • 6.9% 10Y total return vs AFRM's -30.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSEZL logoSEZL66.1% NII/revenue growth vs AFRM's 38.8%
ValueSEZL logoSEZLLower P/E (21.2x vs 62.5x)
Quality / MarginsSEZL logoSEZL29.6% margin vs AFRM's 11.9%
Stability / SafetySEZL logoSEZLBeta 2.39 vs AFRM's 2.72, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SEZL logoSEZL+89.2% vs AFRM's +30.7%
Efficiency (ROA)SEZL logoSEZL37.7% ROA vs AFRM's 3.1%, ROIC 52.7% vs -0.7%

AFRM vs SEZL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Merchant Network
79.2%$883M
Virtual Card Network
20.8%$231M
SEZLSezzle Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
54.0%$117M
Subscription Revenue
46.0%$99M

AFRM vs SEZL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSEZLLAGGINGAFRM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SEZL leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

AFRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 7.1x SEZL's $450M. SEZL is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFRM's 11.9%.

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.2B$450M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$533M$197M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$382M$148M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$787M$238M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.6%+85.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.2%+39.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.9%+29.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.6%+46.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-65.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+47.0%
SEZL leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SEZL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 26.8x trailing earnings, SEZL trades at a 94% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SEZL's 19.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 210.0x.

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
Market CapShares × price$22.4B$3.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$28.9B$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS449.07x26.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.62.49x21.25x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple209.99x19.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.96x7.45x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.48x21.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF37.29x16.11x
SEZL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SEZL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

SEZL delivers a 90.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $91 in annual profit, vs $11 for AFRM. SEZL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.83x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFRM's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEZL scores 9/9 vs AFRM's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.2%+90.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.1%+37.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.7%+52.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.9%+70.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–969
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.56x0.83x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6.5B$77M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.4B$64M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7.9B$141M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.88x23.74x
SEZL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SEZL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SEZL five years ago would be worth $21,738 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,474 for AFRM. Over the past 12 months, SEZL leads with a +89.2% total return vs AFRM's +30.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEZL at 2.1% vs AFRM's 78.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.0%+53.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+30.7%+89.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+464.2%+2962.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+24.7%+117.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.7%+687.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+78.0%+2.1%
SEZL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AFRM and SEZL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SEZL is the less volatile stock with a 2.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFRM's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFRM currently trades 67.4% from its 52-week high vs SEZL's 53.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.72x2.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$100.00$186.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$42.09$49.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.4%+53.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.161.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.3M808K
Evenly matched — AFRM and SEZL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates AFRM as "Buy" and SEZL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.9% upside for AFRM (target: $81) vs -14.8% for SEZL (target: $85).

MetricAFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$80.77$85.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts335
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%+1.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SEZL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallSezzle Inc. (SEZL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AFRM vs SEZL: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AFRM or SEZL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) is the stronger pick with 66. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 8% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) offers the better valuation at 26. 8x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AFRM or SEZL?

On trailing P/E, Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) is the cheapest at 26. 8x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, Sezzle Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AFRM or SEZL?

Over the past 5 years, Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) delivered a total return of +117. 4%, compared to +24. 7% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEZL returned +687. 8% versus AFRM's -30. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AFRM or SEZL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 39β versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AFRM is approximately 14% more volatile than SEZL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 83% versus 3% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AFRM or SEZL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) is pulling ahead at 66. 1% versus 38. 8% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affirm Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 109. 0% year-over-year, compared to 69. 9% for Sezzle Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AFRM or SEZL?

Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus 1. 6% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEZL leads at 39. 3% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEZL leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AFRM or SEZL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) trades at 21. 2x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 41. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AFRM: 19. 9% to $80. 77.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AFRM or SEZL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AFRM or SEZL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+687. 8% 10Y return). Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEZL: +687. 8%, AFRM: -30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AFRM and SEZL?

These companies operate in different sectors (AFRM (Technology) and SEZL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AFRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SEZL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 33%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AFRM and SEZL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AFRM: -65.8% · SEZL: 66.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(AFRM: 11.9% · SEZL: 29.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AFRM: 449.1x · SEZL: 26.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.