KLTR vs LPSN

For growth investors, Kaltura, Inc.

(KLTR) is the stronger pick with 1. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Kaltura, Inc. (KLTR) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (55. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kaltura, Inc. (KLTR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Kaltura, Inc.

(KLTR) delivered a total return of -88. 3%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KLTR returned -88. 3% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kaltura, Inc.

(KLTR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 77% more volatile than KLTR relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kaltura, Inc.

(KLTR) is pulling ahead at 1. 2% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kaltura, Inc. grew EPS 137. 6% year-over-year, compared to 45. 4% for LivePerson, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KLTR leads at 2. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Kaltura, Inc.

(KLTR) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KLTR leads at -4. 3% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KLTR leads at 70. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kaltura, Inc.

(KLTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15)). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KLTR: -88. 3%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KLTR is a small-cap deep-value stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.