Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KNSA vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
KNSA vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4.32B | $7.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $754M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $-303M |
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | — |
| Forward P/E | 42.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $166M | $357M |
KNSA vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kiniksa Pharmaceuti… (KNSA) | 100 | 371.8 | +271.8% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 64.4 | -35.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KNSA vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KNSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.19
- Rev growth 60.1%, EPS growth 225.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 45.5%
- 199.1% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -19.0%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.6% vs KNSA's +116.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 60.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.7% margin vs PRAX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.6% vs KNSA's +116.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs PRAX's -53.5%, ROIC 17.1% vs -65.0% |
KNSA vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KNSA vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNSA and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $754M and $0 in trailing revenue. On growth, KNSA holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $754M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $94M | -$326M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | -$303M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $164M | -$249M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.5% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +145.5% | -19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KNSA and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $7.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 77.64x | -25.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.51x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 52.87x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.38x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.10x | 8.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 170.04x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KNSA leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNSA delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-59 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KNSA's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KNSA scores 6/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | -58.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.9% | -53.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.1% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$156M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $166M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KNSA and PRAX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KNSA five years ago would be worth $39,829 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,157 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +860.9% total return vs KNSA's +116.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 176.1% vs KNSA's 64.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.6% | +18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +116.1% | +860.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +343.2% | +2005.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +298.3% | -18.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.1% | -19.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +64.3% | +176.1% |
Risk & Volatility
KNSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KNSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KNSA currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs PRAX's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.25 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.85 | $34.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.7 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 720K | 376K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KNSA as "Buy" and PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 9.9% for KNSA (target: $64).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.00 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
KNSA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
KNSA vs PRAX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KNSA or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
(KNSA) is the stronger pick with 60. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA) offers the better valuation at 77. 6x trailing P/E (42. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (KNSA) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KNSA or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
(KNSA) delivered a total return of +298. 3%, compared to -18. 4% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KNSA returned +199. 1% versus PRAX's -19. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KNSA or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
(KNSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 707% more volatile than KNSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KNSA or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
(KNSA) is pulling ahead at 60. 1% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KNSA or PRAX?
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
(KNSA) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KNSA leads at 11. 4% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KNSA leads at 54. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KNSA or PRAX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 61.
1% to $544. 40.
07Which pays a better dividend — KNSA or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is KNSA or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
(KNSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), +199. 1% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KNSA: +199. 1%, PRAX: -19. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KNSA and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KNSA is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.