REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KREF vs RC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
KREF vs RC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $422M | $330M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $442M | $-9M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $-311M |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | — |
| Total Debt | $4.69B | $6.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $144M |
KREF vs RC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KKR Real Estate Fin… (KREF) | 100 | 40.6 | -59.4% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 34.8 | -65.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KREF vs RC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KREF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 15.2%
- Rev growth -22.7%, EPS growth -6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, current ratio 0.32x
RC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs KREF's -9.2%
- 59.3% yield, vs KREF's 15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -22.7% FFO/revenue growth vs RC's -93.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -23.6% margin vs RC's -15.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs RC's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 59.3% yield, vs KREF's 15.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -16.7% vs RC's -47.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.6% ROA vs RC's -3.7% |
KREF vs RC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KREF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KREF and RC operate at a comparable scale, with $442M and -$9M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -23.6% (KREF) to -15.9% (RC). On growth, KREF holds the edge at -13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | -$9M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $140M | -$95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | -$311M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $366M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -23.6% | -15.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | -187.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.8% | -69.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | -86.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KREF leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $422M | $330M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.0B | $6.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.26x | -0.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.35x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.92x | 12.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 0.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.33x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KREF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KREF delivers a -8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-17 for RC. RC carries lower financial leverage with a 3.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KREF's 3.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KREF scores 4/9 vs RC's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.4% | -16.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | -3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.83x | 3.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.6B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $144M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.7B | $6.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.84x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KREF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KREF five years ago would be worth $6,401 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,520 for RC. Over the past 12 months, KREF leads with a -16.7% total return vs RC's -47.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KREF at -0.3% vs RC's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.6% | -4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.7% | -47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.8% | -55.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.0% | -44.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.2% | +5.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.3% | -23.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KREF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KREF is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KREF currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs RC's 42.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.98 | $4.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.29 | $1.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.8% | +42.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.1 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KREF as "Buy" and RC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for RC (target: $3) vs 6.5% for KREF (target: $7). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 59.25% vs KREF's 15.23%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +15.2% | +59.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.3% | +24.9% |
KREF leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
KREF vs RC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KREF or RC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) is the stronger pick with -22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -93. 0% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Analysts rate KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KREF or RC?
Over the past 5 years, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) delivered a total return of -36. 0%, compared to -44. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RC returned +5. 4% versus KREF's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KREF or RC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 34% more volatile than KREF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KREF or RC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) is pulling ahead at -22. 7% versus -93. 0% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ready Capital Corporation grew EPS -217. 9% year-over-year, compared to -652. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KREF leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KREF or RC?
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 3% net margin versus -1593. 0% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps -10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KREF leads at 59. 3% versus 0. 0% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — KREF or RC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 59. 3%, versus 15. 2% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF).
07Is KREF or RC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
(KREF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 15. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KREF: -9. 2%, RC: +5. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between KREF and RC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.