REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KREF vs RC vs BXMT vs ACRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
KREF vs RC vs BXMT vs ACRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $423M | $357M | $3.23B | $280M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $442M | $499M | $1.54B | $55M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $-229M | $104M | $-20M |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | -0.0% | 62.6% | 46.3% |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | -50.5% | 58.3% | 44.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 12.0x | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $4.69B | $5.86B | $16.16B | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $248M | $453M | $29M |
KREF vs RC vs BXMT vs ACRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KKR Real Estate Fin… (KREF) | 100 | 40.6 | -59.4% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 36.8 | -63.2% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Ares Commercial Rea… (ACRE) | 100 | 67.8 | -32.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KREF vs RC vs BXMT vs ACRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KREF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 15.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, current ratio 0.32x
- Beta 0.87, yield 15.2%, current ratio 0.32x
RC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs KREF's -22.7%
- 31.4% yield, vs BXMT's 9.9%
BXMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 50.5% 10Y total return vs ACRE's 43.3%
- Lower P/E (12.0x vs 16.3x)
- 6.7% margin vs RC's -45.8%
- Beta 0.74 vs RC's 1.17
ACRE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +20.7% vs RC's -44.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs KREF's -22.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 16.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.7% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs RC's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 31.4% yield, vs BXMT's 9.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.7% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.5% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 4.3% vs 1.2% |
KREF vs RC vs BXMT vs ACRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KREF vs RC vs BXMT vs ACRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BXMT leads in 3 of 6 categories
RC leads 2 • KREF leads 0 • ACRE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 28.1x ACRE's $55M. BXMT is the more profitable business, keeping 6.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | $499M | $1.5B | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $140M | -$249M | $948M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | -$229M | $104M | -$20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $303M | $335M | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | -0.0% | +62.6% | +46.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | -50.5% | +58.3% | +44.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -23.6% | -45.8% | +6.7% | -36.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +60.6% | +21.8% | -80.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.8% | +8.7% | +4.0% | -10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | +24.9% | — | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RC and BXMT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BXMT's 16.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $423M | $357M | $3.2B | $280M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.0B | $6.0B | $18.9B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.27x | -1.50x | 29.92x | -307.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.98x | 16.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.35x | 48.25x | 16.35x | 18.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.92x | 0.71x | 2.12x | 3.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 0.22x | 0.93x | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.34x | — | 11.71x | 14.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BXMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BXMT delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. ACRE carries lower financial leverage with a 2.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BXMT scores 6/9 vs KREF's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.4% | -12.2% | +2.9% | -3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | -2.6% | +0.5% | -1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.4% | +1.2% | +4.3% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +1.4% | +11.3% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.83x | 3.55x | 4.61x | 2.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.6B | $5.6B | $15.7B | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $248M | $453M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.7B | $5.9B | $16.2B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.84x | 0.41x | 1.11x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BXMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BXMT five years ago would be worth $9,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,564 for RC. Over the past 12 months, ACRE leads with a +20.7% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BXMT at 14.0% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.5% | +1.4% | +0.7% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.9% | -44.9% | +12.1% | +20.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | -54.4% | +48.1% | -4.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.6% | -44.4% | -4.1% | -29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.1% | +6.1% | +50.5% | +43.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.2% | -23.1% | +14.0% | -1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BXMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BXMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.17x | 0.74x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.98 | $4.75 | $20.67 | $5.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.29 | $1.51 | $17.67 | $4.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.9% | +45.5% | +92.6% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 64.1 | 47.5 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.1M | 1.4M | 396K |
Analyst Outlook
RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KREF as "Buy", RC as "Buy", BXMT as "Hold", ACRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for RC (target: $3) vs -1.0% for ACRE (target: $5). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs BXMT's 9.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $2.50 | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 16 | 18 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +15.2% | +31.4% | +9.9% | +14.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $0.68 | $1.89 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.3% | +18.9% | +3.4% | 0.0% |
BXMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
KREF vs RC vs BXMT vs ACRE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KREF or RC or BXMT or ACRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22.
7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT) offers the better valuation at 29. 9x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KREF or RC or BXMT or ACRE?
On forward P/E, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 12. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KREF or RC or BXMT or ACRE?
Over the past 5 years, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) delivered a total return of -4. 1%, compared to -44. 4% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXMT returned +50. 5% versus KREF's -9. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KREF or RC or BXMT or ACRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 58% more volatile than BXMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KREF or RC or BXMT or ACRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -22.
7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to -652. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RC leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KREF or RC or BXMT or ACRE?
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 2% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACRE leads at 72. 4% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KREF leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KREF or RC or BXMT or ACRE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RC: 15. 7% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — KREF or RC or BXMT or ACRE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 9. 9% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT).
09Is KREF or RC or BXMT or ACRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 9. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BXMT: +50. 5%, RC: +6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KREF and RC and BXMT and ACRE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KREF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ACRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.