LESL vs POOL

For growth investors, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the stronger pick with -0.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Pool Corporation (POOL) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pool Corporation (POOL) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Pool Corporation (POOL) delivered a total return of -51.

8%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POOL returned +146. 4% versus LESL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pool Corporation (POOL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

00β versus Leslie's, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning LESL is approximately 119% more volatile than POOL relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pool Corporation (POOL) is pulling ahead at -0.

4% versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pool Corporation grew EPS -4. 0% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LESL leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Pool Corporation (POOL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

7% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: POOL leads at 11. 0% versus 1. 1% for LESL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LESL leads at 35. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, POOL (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. LESL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

00), 2. 6% yield, +146. 4% 10Y return). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (POOL: +146. 4%, LESL: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (LESL (Consumer Cyclical) and POOL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POOL is a small-cap deep-value stock. POOL pays a dividend while LESL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.