Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $22M | $1.79B | $2.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $219M | $2.48B | $9.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $100M | $-568M |
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 34.6% | 22.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 7.3% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.5x | 34.9x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $410M | $18.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $142M | $2.04B |
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LightInTheBox Holdi… (LITB) | 100 | 49.8 | -50.2% |
| Globant S.A. (GLOB) | 100 | 29.0 | -71.0% |
| VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) | 100 | 61.7 | -38.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LITB vs GLOB vs VNET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LITB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- beta 0.45
- Beta 0.45 vs VNET's 2.70
- +88.2% vs GLOB's -66.0%
GLOB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.3%, EPS growth 2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.0%
- 15.2% 10Y total return vs VNET's -51.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.60, Low D/E 20.2%, current ratio 1.54x
VNET plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.3% revenue growth vs LITB's -59.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 34.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs VNET's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs VNET's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.2% vs GLOB's -66.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs VNET's -1.5% |
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GLOB leads in 1 of 6 categories
VNET leads 1 • LITB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LITB and GLOB and VNET each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNET is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.5B annually — 43.3x LITB's $219M. GLOB is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNET's -6.0%. On growth, VNET holds the edge at +23.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $219M | $2.5B | $9.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $321M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $100M | -$568M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $231M | -$3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.1% | +34.6% | +22.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +7.3% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +4.0% | -6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.8% | +9.3% | -40.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +0.4% | +23.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | -28.4% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GLOB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, GLOB trades at a 88% valuation discount to VNET's 93.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GLOB's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VNET's 15.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $1.8B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14M | $2.1B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.54x | 10.94x | 93.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.52x | 34.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.52x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.31x | 15.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 0.74x | 2.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.89x | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.11x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LITB and GLOB each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLOB delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-8 for VNET. GLOB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNET's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNET scores 7/9 vs LITB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +4.4% | -7.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +3.0% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +8.3% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.6% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.20x | 2.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $268M | $16.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $142M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $410M | $18.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 406.59x | 4.74x | 1.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VNET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VNET five years ago would be worth $3,635 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,237 for LITB. Over the past 12 months, LITB leads with a +88.2% total return vs GLOB's -66.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNET at 44.4% vs GLOB's -33.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.0% | -35.5% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.2% | -66.0% | +31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.6% | -71.1% | +201.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | -80.9% | -63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.2% | +15.2% | -51.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.1% | -33.9% | +44.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LITB and VNET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LITB is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNET's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VNET currently trades 62.2% from its 52-week high vs GLOB's 28.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 1.60x | 2.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.17 | $142.25 | $14.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $38.49 | $5.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.3% | +28.6% | +62.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 33.2 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 1.3M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LITB as "Hold", GLOB as "Buy", VNET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 161.4% upside for VNET (target: $24) vs 56.9% for GLOB (target: $64).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $63.83 | $23.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 28 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
GLOB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). VNET leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LITB or GLOB or VNET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Globant S.
A. (GLOB) is the stronger pick with 15. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -59. 4% for LightInTheBox Holding Co. , Ltd. (LITB). Globant S. A. (GLOB) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Globant S. A. (GLOB) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LITB or GLOB or VNET?
On trailing P/E, Globant S.
A. (GLOB) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus VNET Group, Inc. at 93. 1x. On forward P/E, Globant S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LITB or GLOB or VNET?
Over the past 5 years, VNET Group, Inc.
(VNET) delivered a total return of -63. 7%, compared to -87. 6% for LightInTheBox Holding Co. , Ltd. (LITB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLOB returned +15. 2% versus LITB's -85. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LITB or GLOB or VNET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LightInTheBox Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LITB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus VNET Group, Inc. 's 2. 70β — meaning VNET is approximately 496% more volatile than LITB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Globant S. A. (GLOB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 3% for VNET Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LITB or GLOB or VNET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Globant S.
A. (GLOB) is pulling ahead at 15. 3% versus -59. 4% for LightInTheBox Holding Co. , Ltd. (LITB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VNET Group, Inc. grew EPS 103. 8% year-over-year, compared to -64. 7% for LightInTheBox Holding Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLOB leads at 23. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LITB or GLOB or VNET?
Globant S.
A. (GLOB) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -1. 0% for LightInTheBox Holding Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLOB leads at 9. 3% versus -0. 9% for LITB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LITB leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LITB or GLOB or VNET more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Globant S.
A. (GLOB) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 34. 9x for VNET Group, Inc. — 28. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNET: 161. 4% to $23. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — LITB or GLOB or VNET?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LITB or GLOB or VNET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LightInTheBox Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LITB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45)). VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LITB: -85. 2%, VNET: -51. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LITB and GLOB and VNET?
These companies operate in different sectors (LITB (Consumer Cyclical) and GLOB (Technology) and VNET (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LITB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLOB is a small-cap high-growth stock; VNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.