Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LOVE vs HOFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
LOVE vs HOFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $228M | $138M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $690M | $376M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 57.7% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | -4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 25.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $183M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $84M | $6M |
LOVE vs HOFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| Hooker Furnishings … (HOFT) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOVE vs HOFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -2.8%, EPS growth -52.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- -2.8% revenue growth vs HOFT's -8.3%
- 1.9% margin vs HOFT's -3.4%
HOFT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 7.3%
- -20.5% 10Y total return vs LOVE's -34.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 34.4%, current ratio 3.53x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.8% revenue growth vs HOFT's -8.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs HOFT's -3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs LOVE's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.3% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.7% vs LOVE's -23.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs HOFT's -4.6%, ROIC 3.3% vs -5.1% |
LOVE vs HOFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LOVE vs HOFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOVE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOVE is the larger business by revenue, generating $690M annually — 1.8x HOFT's $376M. LOVE is the more profitable business, keeping 1.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOFT's -3.4%. On growth, LOVE holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $690M | $376M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $58M | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.7% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | -4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -13.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.4% | -63.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HOFT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $228M | $138M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $327M | $202M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.64x | -10.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.68x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.54x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 0.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOVE leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOVE delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-7 for HOFT. HOFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOVE scores 5/9 vs HOFT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | -6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | -5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | -6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $99M | $64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $84M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $183M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -13.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOFT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOFT five years ago would be worth $4,329 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,157 for LOVE. Over the past 12 months, HOFT leads with a +57.7% total return vs LOVE's -23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOFT at 0.4% vs LOVE's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.2% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.5% | +57.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.1% | +1.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.4% | -56.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.9% | -20.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.7% | +0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
HOFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOVE's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOFT currently trades 80.4% from its 52-week high vs LOVE's 71.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.90 | $15.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.33 | $8.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.3% | +80.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 299K | 43K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LOVE as "Buy" and HOFT as "Buy". HOFT is the only dividend payer here at 7.28% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.7% | 0.0% |
HOFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). LOVE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
LOVE vs HOFT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOVE or HOFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is the stronger pick with -2.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). The Lovesac Company (LOVE) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (25. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LOVE or HOFT?
Over the past 5 years, Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) delivered a total return of -56.
7%, compared to -78. 4% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOFT returned -20. 5% versus LOVE's -34. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LOVE or HOFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
73β versus The Lovesac Company's 1. 33β — meaning LOVE is approximately 82% more volatile than HOFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LOVE or HOFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is pulling ahead at -2.
8% versus -8. 3% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Lovesac Company grew EPS -52. 4% year-over-year, compared to -236. 4% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LOVE or HOFT?
The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
7% net margin versus -3. 1% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOVE leads at 2. 0% versus -4. 6% for HOFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOVE leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LOVE or HOFT?
In this comparison, HOFT (7.
3% yield) pays a dividend. LOVE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is LOVE or HOFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
73), 7. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFT: -20. 5%, LOVE: -34. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LOVE and HOFT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. HOFT pays a dividend while LOVE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.