Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MBIN vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
MBIN vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $2.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $219M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.84B | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $657M |
MBIN vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) | 100 | 409.7 | +309.7% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.8 | +37.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBIN vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 337.3% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 84.0%
- NIM 2.7% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 10.9x)
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.00x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.6% NII/revenue growth vs MBIN's -5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAFD's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs MBIN's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.6% vs WAFD's +29.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAFD's 0.3% |
MBIN vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MBIN vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD and MBIN operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $1.4B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.0% (WAFD) to 16.0% (MBIN).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $219M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$170M | $226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.6% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.8% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MBIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, MBIN trades at a 9% valuation discount to WAFD's 13.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WAFD's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MBIN's 22.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.35x | 13.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.96x | 10.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.34x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.57x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WAFD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MBIN delivers a 9.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. WAFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBIN's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs MBIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.8B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.8B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.39x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MBIN five years ago would be worth $16,188 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,231 for WAFD. Over the past 12 months, MBIN leads with a +53.6% total return vs WAFD's +29.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MBIN at 27.2% vs WAFD's 14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.0% | +11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.6% | +29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.7% | +51.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.9% | +22.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +337.3% | +84.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.2% | +14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBIN's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs MBIN's 93.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.20 | $36.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.75 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.0% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 198K | 660K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MBIN and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MBIN as "Buy" and WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.8% upside for MBIN (target: $55) vs -1.8% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, WAFD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs MBIN's 2.77%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.50 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.29 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.7% |
WAFD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MBIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MBIN vs WAFD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBIN or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger pick with -1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBIN or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus WaFd, Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, Merchants Bancorp is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBIN or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) delivered a total return of +61.
9%, compared to +22. 3% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MBIN returned +337. 3% versus WAFD's +84. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBIN or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Merchants Bancorp's 1. 09β — meaning MBIN is approximately 33% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 168% for Merchants Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBIN or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is pulling ahead at -1. 6% versus -5. 7% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WaFd, Inc. grew EPS 5. 2% year-over-year, compared to -40. 0% for Merchants Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBIN or WAFD?
WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 16. 0% for Merchants Bancorp — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WAFD leads at 20. 5% versus 19. 3% for MBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WAFD leads at 50. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBIN or WAFD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) trades at 9.
0x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for WaFd, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBIN: 16. 8% to $54. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBIN or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 8% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN).
09Is MBIN or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +84. 0%, MBIN: +337. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBIN and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.