Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MBIN vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MBIN vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $2.73B | $2.22B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $1.41B | $819M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $219M | $243M | $195M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 50.9% | 79.0% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 20.5% | 29.5% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 10.9x | 10.5x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.84B | $1.82B | $373M | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $657M | $183M | $910M |
MBIN vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) | 100 | 410.8 | +310.8% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBIN vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 338.3% 10Y total return vs BANR's 101.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +57.0% vs HOMB's -1.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BANR's 0.5%
WAFD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BANR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth -0.9%, EPS growth 15.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 19.1%, current ratio 0.02x
- PEG 0.90 vs HOMB's 3.55
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.8% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs MBIN's -5.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs MBIN's -5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.90 vs 3.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs MBIN's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.0% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BANR's 0.5% |
MBIN vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MBIN vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BANR leads in 2 of 6 categories
MBIN leads 1 • WAFD leads 0 • HOMB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BANR and HOMB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 1.8x BANR's $819M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBIN's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.4B | $819M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | $277M | $253M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $219M | $243M | $195M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$170M | $226M | $248M | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +50.9% | +79.0% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +20.5% | +29.5% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +16.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.6% | +14.8% | +30.3% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.8% | +46.3% | +11.2% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 14% valuation discount to WAFD's 13.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.00x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $2.7B | $2.2B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $3.9B | $2.4B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.38x | 13.56x | 11.63x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.99x | 10.93x | 10.47x | 10.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.41x | 1.00x | 4.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.36x | 12.98x | 9.55x | 10.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 1.93x | 2.71x | 3.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 0.94x | 1.16x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.09x | 8.96x | 12.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BANR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. BANR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBIN's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs MBIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +8.0% | +10.3% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.2% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +3.9% | +7.7% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +5.7% | +10.1% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.60x | 0.19x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.8B | $1.2B | $190M | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $657M | $183M | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.8B | $1.8B | $373M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.39x | 0.48x | 1.11x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MBIN five years ago would be worth $16,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,664 for HOMB. Over the past 12 months, MBIN leads with a +57.0% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MBIN at 27.3% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.4% | +11.9% | +6.6% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.0% | +28.5% | +9.1% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +51.6% | +60.7% | +42.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.7% | +22.5% | +29.6% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +338.3% | +84.4% | +101.1% | +58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.3% | +14.9% | +17.1% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WAFD and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBIN's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.81x | 0.80x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.20 | $36.12 | $69.83 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.75 | $26.31 | $57.05 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +98.8% | +93.9% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 68.3 | 58.0 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 197K | 661K | 292K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BANR and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MBIN as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold", BANR as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, BANR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.99% vs MBIN's 2.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.50 | $35.00 | $70.00 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 | 13 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +3.0% | +3.0% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 7 | 1 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.29 | $1.05 | $1.96 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.7% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
BANR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MBIN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
MBIN vs WAFD vs BANR vs HOMB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBIN or WAFD or BANR or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBIN or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
6x versus WaFd, Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, Merchants Bancorp is actually cheaper at 9. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 90x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBIN or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) delivered a total return of +62.
7%, compared to +6. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MBIN returned +338. 3% versus HOMB's +58. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBIN or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banner Corporation (BANR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Merchants Bancorp's 1. 09β — meaning MBIN is approximately 36% more volatile than BANR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banner Corporation (BANR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 168% for Merchants Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBIN or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -5. 7% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banner Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -40. 0% for Merchants Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBIN or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus 16. 0% for Merchants Bancorp — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus 19. 3% for MBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANR leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBIN or WAFD or BANR or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for WaFd, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBIN or WAFD or BANR or HOMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 8% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN).
09Is MBIN or WAFD or BANR or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 3. 0% yield, +101. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANR: +101. 1%, MBIN: +338. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBIN and WAFD and BANR and HOMB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.