Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
MBIN vs WAFD vs CUBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MBIN vs WAFD vs CUBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $2.73B | $2.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $1.41B | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $219M | $243M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 50.9% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 20.5% | 22.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 10.9x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $3.84B | $1.82B | $1.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $657M | $62M |
MBIN vs WAFD vs CUBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) | 100 | 410.8 | +310.8% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Customers Bancorp, … (CUBI) | 100 | 702.5 | +602.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBIN vs WAFD vs CUBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 338.3% 10Y total return vs CUBI's 215.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAFD's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
- 2.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 3.0%
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.00x
- Beta 0.81, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.00x
CUBI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 3.9%, EPS growth 21.8%
- PEG 1.05 vs WAFD's 3.55
- NIM 3.0% vs WAFD's 2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.9% NII/revenue growth vs MBIN's -5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 10.9x), PEG 1.05 vs 3.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAFD's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs CUBI's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.0% vs WAFD's +28.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs WAFD's 0.3% |
MBIN vs WAFD vs CUBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MBIN vs WAFD vs CUBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CUBI leads in 1 of 6 categories
WAFD leads 1 • MBIN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CUBI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CUBI and MBIN operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $1.4B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.0% (WAFD) to 15.8% (CUBI).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | $277M | $352M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $219M | $243M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$170M | $226M | $337M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +50.9% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +20.5% | +22.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +16.0% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.6% | +14.8% | +34.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.8% | +46.3% | +178.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MBIN and CUBI each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, MBIN trades at a 9% valuation discount to WAFD's 13.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CUBI offers better value at 1.43x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $2.7B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $3.9B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.38x | 13.56x | 12.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.99x | 10.93x | 9.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.41x | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.36x | 12.98x | 12.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 1.93x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 0.94x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.09x | 5.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — WAFD and CUBI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBI delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. WAFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBIN's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs MBIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +8.0% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +3.9% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +5.7% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.60x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.8B | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $657M | $62M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.8B | $1.8B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.39x | 0.48x | 0.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MBIN and CUBI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CUBI five years ago would be worth $22,235 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,248 for WAFD. Over the past 12 months, MBIN leads with a +57.0% total return vs WAFD's +28.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CUBI at 63.7% vs WAFD's 14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.4% | +11.9% | +4.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.0% | +28.5% | +55.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +51.6% | +338.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.7% | +22.5% | +122.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +338.3% | +84.4% | +215.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.3% | +14.9% | +63.7% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CUBI's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs MBIN's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.81x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.20 | $36.12 | $82.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.75 | $26.31 | $49.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +98.8% | +94.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 68.3 | 61.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 197K | 661K | 365K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MBIN and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MBIN as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold", CUBI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for MBIN (target: $55) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, WAFD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs CUBI's 0.39%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.50 | $35.00 | $89.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +3.0% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.29 | $1.05 | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.7% | +5.6% |
CUBI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). WAFD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 4 tied.
MBIN vs WAFD vs CUBI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBIN or WAFD or CUBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Customers Bancorp, Inc.
(CUBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBIN or WAFD or CUBI?
On trailing P/E, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) is the cheapest at 12.
4x versus WaFd, Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, Merchants Bancorp is actually cheaper at 9. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Customers Bancorp, Inc. wins at 1. 05x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBIN or WAFD or CUBI?
Over the past 5 years, Customers Bancorp, Inc.
(CUBI) delivered a total return of +122. 3%, compared to +22. 5% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MBIN returned +338. 3% versus WAFD's +84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBIN or WAFD or CUBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Customers Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning CUBI is approximately 57% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 168% for Merchants Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBIN or WAFD or CUBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Customers Bancorp, Inc.
(CUBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 9% versus -5. 7% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Customers Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 21. 8% year-over-year, compared to -40. 0% for Merchants Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBIN or WAFD or CUBI?
WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 15. 8% for Customers Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CUBI leads at 22. 0% versus 19. 3% for MBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CUBI leads at 51. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBIN or WAFD or CUBI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Customers Bancorp, Inc. (CUBI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 05x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for WaFd, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBIN: 16. 5% to $54. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBIN or WAFD or CUBI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 0. 4% for Customers Bancorp, Inc. (CUBI).
09Is MBIN or WAFD or CUBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +84. 4%, CUBI: +215. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBIN and WAFD and CUBI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MBIN, WAFD pay a dividend while CUBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.