Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
MGTX vs ADVM vs OCGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
MGTX vs ADVM vs OCGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $779M | $96M | $487M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $0.00 | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-169M | $-204M | $-68M |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | -139.2% | -14.3% |
| Total Debt | $85M | $92M | $33M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $61M | $19M |
MGTX vs ADVM vs OCGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MeiraGTx Holdings p… (MGTX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| Adverum Biotechnolo… (ADVM) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| Ocugen, Inc. (OCGN) | 100 | 464.5 | +364.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MGTX vs ADVM vs OCGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 137.4%, EPS growth -42.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.1%
- -35.5% 10Y total return vs ADVM's -89.2%
- 137.4% revenue growth vs ADVM's -72.2%
ADVM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.09
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 5.73x
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 5.73x
OCGN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +117.5% vs ADVM's +45.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 137.4% revenue growth vs ADVM's -72.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.2% margin vs ADVM's -130.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs MGTX's 1.92 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.5% vs ADVM's +45.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -76.5% ROA vs ADVM's -282.3%, ROIC -167.7% vs -124.2% |
MGTX vs ADVM vs OCGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MGTX vs ADVM vs OCGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
ADVM leads 0 • OCGN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGTX and ADVM operate at a comparable scale, with $27M and $0 in trailing revenue. MGTX is the more profitable business, keeping -6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ADVM's -130.9%. On growth, MGTX holds the edge at -96.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $0 | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$151M | -$205M | -$61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$169M | -$204M | -$68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | -$138M | -$57M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.0% | +100.0% | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | -139.2% | -14.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -130.9% | -15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -92.8% | -13.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -96.2% | -100.0% | -125.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.7% | -56.2% | -18.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MGTX and ADVM and OCGN each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $779M | $96M | $487M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $760M | $127M | $502M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.57x | -0.66x | -6.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 23.41x | 96.26x | 110.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.96x | 1.22x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADVM delivers a -189.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-190 in annual profit, vs $-26 for OCGN. MGTX carries lower financial leverage with a 1.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADVM's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADVM scores 3/9 vs OCGN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.7% | -189.8% | -26.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -76.5% | -2.8% | -123.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -167.7% | -124.2% | -15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.1% | -95.1% | -154.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.25x | 1.30x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | $31M | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $61M | $19M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $85M | $92M | $33M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.44x | — | -13.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MGTX and OCGN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGTX five years ago would be worth $6,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,153 for ADVM. Over the past 12 months, OCGN leads with a +117.5% total return vs ADVM's +45.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OCGN at 26.1% vs ADVM's -18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.9% | — | +4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +78.9% | +45.3% | +117.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.6% | -46.5% | +100.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.6% | -88.5% | -84.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.5% | -89.2% | -98.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.1% | -18.8% | +26.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGTX and ADVM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADVM is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGTX's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGTX currently trades 81.7% from its 52-week high vs OCGN's 52.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.09x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.85 | $5.75 | $2.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.55 | $1.78 | $0.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.7% | +75.8% | +52.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 58.2 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 725K | 0 | 9.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MGTX as "Buy", OCGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 247.2% upside for OCGN (target: $5) vs 141.0% for MGTX (target: $23).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.33 | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MGTX leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
MGTX vs ADVM vs OCGN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MGTX or ADVM or OCGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is the stronger pick with 137.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -72. 2% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. (ADVM). Analysts rate MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MGTX or ADVM or OCGN?
Over the past 5 years, MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) delivered a total return of -30.
6%, compared to -88. 5% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. (ADVM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGTX returned -35. 5% versus OCGN's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MGTX or ADVM or OCGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc.
(ADVM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus MeiraGTx Holdings plc's 1. 92β — meaning MGTX is approximately 76% more volatile than ADVM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 125% versus 130% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MGTX or ADVM or OCGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is pulling ahead at 137.
4% versus -72. 2% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. (ADVM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ocugen, Inc. grew EPS -15. 0% year-over-year, compared to -227. 7% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OCGN leads at 21. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MGTX or ADVM or OCGN?
MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) is the more profitable company, earning -444.
1% net margin versus -130. 9% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps -444. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGTX leads at -493. 4% versus -139. 2% for ADVM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADVM leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MGTX or ADVM or OCGN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MGTX or ADVM or OCGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc.
(ADVM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09)). MeiraGTx Holdings plc (MGTX) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADVM: -89. 2%, MGTX: -35. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MGTX and ADVM and OCGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ADVM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OCGN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.