MU vs STX

For growth investors, Micron Technology, Inc.

(MU) is the stronger pick with 48. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 9% for Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX). Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) offers the better valuation at 84. 4x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) a "Buy" — based on 68 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Micron Technology, Inc.

(MU) is the cheapest at 84. 4x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc at 113. 9x. On forward P/E, Micron Technology, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Micron Technology, Inc. wins at 0. 43x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 4. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) delivered a total return of +787.

8%, compared to +654. 7% for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MU returned +62. 9% versus STX's +38. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

04β versus Micron Technology, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning MU is approximately 22% more volatile than STX relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Micron Technology, Inc.

(MU) is pulling ahead at 48. 9% versus 38. 9% for Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Micron Technology, Inc. grew EPS 984. 3% year-over-year, compared to 328. 5% for Seagate Technology Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, MU leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Micron Technology, Inc.

(MU) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 8% net margin versus 16. 1% for Seagate Technology Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 22. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MU leads at 26. 4% versus 20. 8% for STX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MU leads at 39. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 43x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 4. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 52. 3x for Seagate Technology Holdings plc — 41. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STX: -19. 1% to $623. 71.

In this comparison, STX (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. MU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Micron Technology, Inc.

(MU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MU: +62. 9%, STX: +38. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.