Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NTB
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • BM
Market Cap$2.21B
5Y Perf.+126.6%
WSFS
WSFS Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.71B
5Y Perf.+154.5%
FIBK
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.37B
5Y Perf.-0.9%

NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NTB logoNTB
WSFS logoWSFS
FIBK logoFIBK
IndustryBanks - DiversifiedBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$2.21B$3.71B$3.37B
Revenue (TTM)$800M$1.36B$1.06B
Net Income (TTM)$232M$287M$302M
Gross Margin75.9%74.7%97.5%
Operating Margin29.8%28.0%37.0%
Forward P/E8.8x11.5x12.9x
Total Debt$39M$303M$776M
Cash & Equiv.$1.61B$1.33B$358M

NTB vs WSFS vs FIBKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NTB
WSFS
FIBK
StockMay 20May 26Return
The Bank of N.T. Bu… (NTB)100226.6+126.6%
WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS)100254.5+154.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NTB leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NTB
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
The Banking Pick

NTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.3%
  • Rev growth -2.0%, EPS growth 16.1%
  • 187.7% 10Y total return vs WSFS's 123.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
WSFS
WSFS Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.4% vs NTB's 2.6%
Best for: bank quality
FIBK
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FIBK is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 5.5% yield, vs NTB's 3.3%
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNTB logoNTB-2.0% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5%
ValueNTB logoNTBLower P/E (8.8x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.65 vs 0.66
Quality / MarginsNTB logoNTBEfficiency ratio 0.5% vs FIBK's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyNTB logoNTBBeta 0.65 vs WSFS's 0.87, lower leverage
DividendsFIBK logoFIBK5.5% yield, vs NTB's 3.3%
Momentum (1Y)NTB logoNTB+35.0% vs FIBK's +2.3%
Efficiency (ROA)NTB logoNTBEfficiency ratio 0.5% vs FIBK's 0.6%

NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NTBThe Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
FY 2025
Bermuda Segment
43.3%$274M
Cayman Segment
31.2%$197M
Channel Islands And United Kingdom Segment
18.1%$115M
Other Operating Segment
7.4%$47M
WSFSWSFS Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Service, Other
50.0%$58M
Managed Service Fees
17.0%$20M
Miscellaneous Products And Services
16.5%$19M
Capital Market Revenue
8.5%$10M
Currency Preparation
5.8%$7M
ATM Insurance
2.2%$3M
FIBKFirst Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
FY 2021
Credit and Debit Card
64.9%$45M
Deposit Account
23.7%$17M
Financial Service, Other
11.4%$8M

NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNTBLAGGINGWSFS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

WSFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 1.7x NTB's $800M. NTB is the more profitable business, keeping 29.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSFS's 21.1%.

MetricNTB logoNTBThe Bank of N.T. …WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…FIBK logoFIBKFirst Interstate …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$800M$1.4B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$267M$408M$428M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$232M$287M$302M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$255M$214M$278M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+75.9%+74.7%+97.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+29.8%+28.0%+37.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+29.0%+21.1%+28.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+31.9%+15.7%+26.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.4%+22.9%+116.0%
FIBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NTB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.1x trailing earnings, NTB trades at a 27% valuation discount to WSFS's 13.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTB offers better value at 0.75x vs FIBK's 3.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNTB logoNTBThe Bank of N.T. …WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…FIBK logoFIBKFirst Interstate …
Market CapShares × price$2.2B$3.7B$3.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$644M$2.7B$3.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.12x13.84x11.77x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.76x11.53x12.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x0.79x3.86x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.42x6.59x9.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.76x2.73x3.19x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.06x1.41x1.03x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.68x17.38x12.14x
NTB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NTB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

NTB delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $9 for FIBK. NTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIBK's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTB scores 8/9 vs WSFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNTB logoNTBThe Bank of N.T. …WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…FIBK logoFIBKFirst Interstate …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+21.2%+10.6%+8.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%+1.4%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.9%+9.5%+5.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.1%+10.3%+4.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9867
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.11x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.6B-$1.0B$418M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.6B$1.3B$358M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$39M$303M$776M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.23x1.30x1.11x
NTB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTB five years ago would be worth $17,083 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,099 for FIBK. Over the past 12 months, NTB leads with a +35.0% total return vs FIBK's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTB at 36.6% vs FIBK's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNTB logoNTBThe Bank of N.T. …WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…FIBK logoFIBKFirst Interstate …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.4%+28.6%-1.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.0%+29.5%+2.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.0%+138.5%+11.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.8%+45.4%+21.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+187.7%+123.0%+39.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+36.6%+33.6%+3.7%
NTB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NTB and WSFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSFS's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs FIBK's 88.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNTB logoNTBThe Bank of N.T. …WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…FIBK logoFIBKFirst Interstate …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x0.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$57.84$73.22$39.26
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$40.59$49.92$31.62
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.7%+96.2%+88.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.955.750.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded145K388K1.2M
Evenly matched — NTB and WSFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NTB and FIBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NTB as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold", FIBK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.2% upside for WSFS (target: $79) vs 3.0% for NTB (target: $57). For income investors, FIBK offers the higher dividend yield at 5.46% vs WSFS's 0.97%.

MetricNTB logoNTBThe Bank of N.T. …WSFS logoWSFSWSFS Financial Co…FIBK logoFIBKFirst Interstate …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$57.00$79.00$38.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts71315
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.3%+1.0%+5.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises210
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.83$0.68$1.89
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.6%+7.8%+3.6%
Evenly matched — NTB and FIBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FIBK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Bank of N.T. Butterfiel… (NTB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NTB or WSFS or FIBK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the stronger pick with -2. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?

On trailing P/E, The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus WSFS Financial Corporation at 13. 8x. On forward P/E, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited wins at 0. 65x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 's 4. 23x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?

Over the past 5 years, The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) delivered a total return of +70. 8%, compared to +21. 0% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTB returned +187. 7% versus FIBK's +39. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus WSFS Financial Corporation's 0. 87β — meaning WSFS is approximately 34% more volatile than NTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 23% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is pulling ahead at -2. 0% versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. grew EPS 34. 2% year-over-year, compared to 15. 4% for WSFS Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?

The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 0% net margin versus 21. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIBK leads at 37. 0% versus 28. 0% for WSFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIBK leads at 97. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NTB or WSFS or FIBK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 65x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 's 4. 23x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WSFS: 12. 2% to $79. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NTB or WSFS or FIBK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 1. 0% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).

09

Is NTB or WSFS or FIBK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Bank of N.

T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 3% yield, +187. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTB: +187. 7%, FIBK: +39. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NTB and WSFS and FIBK?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NTB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WSFS

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIBK

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NTB and WSFS and FIBK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NTB: -2.0% · WSFS: -3.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(NTB: 29.0% · WSFS: 21.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NTB: 10.1x · WSFS: 13.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.