Software - Application
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
NTWK vs DSGX vs APPF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
NTWK vs DSGX vs APPF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $45M | $6.12B | $6.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70M | $731M | $995M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $164M | $152M |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 71.4% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 30.4% | 17.1% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 39.3x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $8M | $71M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $354M | $107M |
NTWK vs DSGX vs APPF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NetSol Technologies… (NTWK) | 100 | 130.4 | +30.4% |
| The Descartes Syste… (DSGX) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 107.3 | +7.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTWK vs DSGX vs APPF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTWK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.60 vs DSGX's 1.53
- Lower P/E (15.4x vs 25.0x)
- +61.8% vs DSGX's -33.9%
DSGX is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 22.5% margin vs NTWK's 5.1%
APPF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.71
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -30.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs DSGX's 285.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs NTWK's 7.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.5% margin vs NTWK's 5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs NTWK's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.8% vs DSGX's -33.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs NTWK's 5.7%, ROIC 22.4% vs 8.5% |
NTWK vs DSGX vs APPF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTWK vs DSGX vs APPF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DSGX leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTWK leads 2 • APPF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DSGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APPF is the larger business by revenue, generating $995M annually — 14.3x NTWK's $70M. DSGX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTWK's 5.1%. On growth, NTWK holds the edge at +21.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $70M | $731M | $995M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $310M | $192M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $164M | $152M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $261M | $234M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +71.4% | +63.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +30.4% | +17.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +22.5% | +15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +35.8% | +23.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.1% | +17.2% | +20.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +120.0% | +23.3% | +37.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NTWK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, NTWK trades at a 64% valuation discount to APPF's 43.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTWK offers better value at 0.60x vs DSGX's 1.45x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $6.1B | $6.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37M | $5.8B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.40x | 37.26x | 43.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 39.34x | 24.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.60x | 1.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.51x | 17.52x | 34.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 8.22x | 6.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 3.87x | 11.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.00x | 25.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DSGX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $8 for NTWK. DSGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTWK's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DSGX scores 7/9 vs APPF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +10.7% | +30.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +9.2% | +24.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +14.9% | +22.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +15.6% | +25.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.01x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$346M | -$36M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $354M | $107M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $8M | $71M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.34x | 229.22x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $12,779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,080 for NTWK. Over the past 12 months, NTWK leads with a +61.8% total return vs DSGX's -33.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTWK at 16.1% vs DSGX's -2.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.8% | -16.4% | -27.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +61.8% | -33.9% | -21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.5% | -8.0% | +21.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.2% | +16.1% | +27.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | +285.3% | +1247.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | -2.7% | +6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTWK and APPF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APPF is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTWK's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTWK currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs APPF's 51.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.71x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.75 | $117.35 | $326.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.34 | $62.56 | $142.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.0% | +60.6% | +51.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 52.0 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27K | 601K | 350K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DSGX as "Buy", APPF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.4% upside for DSGX (target: $104) vs 41.6% for APPF (target: $237).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $103.50 | $236.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +0.0% | +3.1% |
DSGX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTWK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NTWK vs DSGX vs APPF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTWK or DSGX or APPF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for NetSol Technologies, Inc. (NTWK). NetSol Technologies, Inc. (NTWK) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTWK or DSGX or APPF?
On trailing P/E, NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus AppFolio, Inc. at 43. 1x. On forward P/E, AppFolio, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTWK or DSGX or APPF?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +27. 8%, compared to -9. 2% for NetSol Technologies, Inc. (NTWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1277% versus NTWK's -40. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTWK or DSGX or APPF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus NetSol Technologies, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning NTWK is approximately 32% more volatile than APPF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 22% for NetSol Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTWK or DSGX or APPF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 7. 6% for NetSol Technologies, Inc. (NTWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NetSol Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 316. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 1% for AppFolio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTWK or DSGX or APPF?
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus 4. 4% for NetSol Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DSGX leads at 32. 3% versus 5. 3% for NTWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DSGX leads at 65. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTWK or DSGX or APPF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 39. 3x for The Descartes Systems Group Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DSGX: 45. 4% to $103. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTWK or DSGX or APPF?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NTWK or DSGX or APPF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1277% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1277%, NTWK: -40. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTWK and DSGX and APPF?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; DSGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.