Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NWFL vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
NWFL vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $283M | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $185M |
NWFL vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Norwood Financial C… (NWFL) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWFL vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWFL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 4.1%
- Rev growth 34.2%, EPS growth 152.5%
- 120.6% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
In this particular matchup, NBTB is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 10.8x), PEG 1.15 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.9% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
NWFL vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NWFL vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWFL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 6.4x NWFL's $136M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.4% (NWFL) to 19.5% (NBTB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +152.6% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NWFL leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, NWFL trades at a 25% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NWFL offers better value at 1.31x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $283M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $313M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.12x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.89x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.31x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.56x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.08x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.79x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWFL leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWFL delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWFL's 0.31x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.74x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NWFL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NWFL five years ago would be worth $14,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,989 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, NWFL leads with a +23.9% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBTB at 15.5% vs NWFL's 10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.9% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.6% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.0% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NWFL and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWFL is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.23 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.70 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWFL and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NWFL as "Hold" and NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for NWFL (target: $33) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NWFL offers the higher dividend yield at 4.09% vs NBTB's 3.17%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.25 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.4% |
NWFL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
NWFL vs NBTB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWFL or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the stronger pick with 34. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWFL or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, Norwood Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Norwood Financial Corp. wins at 1. 15x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWFL or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) delivered a total return of +45. 8%, compared to +29. 9% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWFL returned +120. 6% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWFL or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 24% more volatile than NWFL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 31% for Norwood Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWFL or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is pulling ahead at 34. 2% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Norwood Financial Corp. grew EPS 152. 5% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWFL or NBTB?
Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWFL leads at 26. 1% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWFL or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWFL: 7. 6% to $33. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWFL or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 3. 2% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB).
09Is NWFL or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72), 4. 1% yield, +120. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWFL: +120. 6%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWFL and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NWFL is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.