Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PHIO vs ARWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
PHIO vs ARWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $11.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $202M |
| Gross Margin | — | 97.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.6% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $366M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $227M |
PHIO vs ARWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phio Pharmaceutical… (PHIO) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR) | 100 | 245.5 | +145.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PHIO vs ARWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PHIO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.59
- Lower volatility, beta 1.59, current ratio 49.37x
- Beta 1.59, current ratio 49.37x
ARWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
- 13.2% 10Y total return vs PHIO's -100.0%
- +5.1% vs PHIO's -33.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.59 vs ARWR's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs PHIO's -33.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs PHIO's -75.8% |
PHIO vs ARWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARWR and PHIO operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $326M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $322M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +97.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +27.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +18.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +29.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +104.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.4% | +115.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PHIO and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $11.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$14M | $11.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.79x | -6486.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 91.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 13.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 21.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 70.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARWR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARWR delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-86 for PHIO. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs PHIO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -86.4% | +35.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -75.8% | +13.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | $140M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $366M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARWR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARWR five years ago would be worth $12,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $49 for PHIO. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +505.0% total return vs PHIO's -33.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 25.1% vs PHIO's -68.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.5% | +16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.1% | +505.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | +95.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +20.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1315.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.2% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PHIO and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PHIO is the less volatile stock with a 1.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARWR's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs PHIO's 27.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $79.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.81 | $12.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.4% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 63.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 271K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $81.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARWR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
PHIO vs ARWR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PHIO or ARWR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PHIO or ARWR?
Over the past 5 years, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) delivered a total return of +20. 5%, compared to -99. 5% for Phio Pharmaceuticals Corp. (PHIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1316% versus PHIO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PHIO or ARWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phio Pharmaceuticals Corp.
(PHIO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 59β versus Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning ARWR is approximately 14% more volatile than PHIO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PHIO or ARWR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to -59. 3% for Phio Pharmaceuticals Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PHIO or ARWR?
Phio Pharmaceuticals Corp.
(PHIO) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -0. 2% for Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARWR leads at 11. 9% versus 0. 0% for PHIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 97. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PHIO or ARWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PHIO or ARWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1316% 10Y return). Phio Pharmaceuticals Corp. (PHIO) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARWR: +1316%, PHIO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PHIO and ARWR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PHIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.