Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PRU vs UNM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.

Insurance - Life

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$34.86B
5Y Perf.+64.3%
UNM
Unum Group

Insurance - Life

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.96B
5Y Perf.+429.8%

PRU vs UNM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PRU logoPRU
UNM logoUNM
IndustryInsurance - LifeInsurance - Life
Market Cap$34.86B$12.96B
Revenue (TTM)$61.82B$13.30B
Net Income (TTM)$3.48B$781M
Gross Margin30.8%33.9%
Operating Margin8.2%7.5%
Forward P/E7.4x9.2x
Total Debt$22.96B$3.90B
Cash & Equiv.$19.71B$158M

PRU vs UNMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PRU
UNM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Prudential Financia… (PRU)100164.3+64.3%
Unum Group (UNM)100529.8+429.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PRU vs UNM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PRU leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Unum Group is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

PRU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (7.4x vs 9.2x)
  • Combined ratio 0.9 vs UNM's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
  • 5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs UNM's 2.2%
Best for: value and quality
UNM
Unum Group
The Insurance Pick

UNM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 2.2%
  • Rev growth 2.1%, EPS growth -54.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
  • 175.7% 10Y total return vs PRU's 88.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUNM logoUNM2.1% revenue growth vs PRU's -14.0%
ValuePRU logoPRULower P/E (7.4x vs 9.2x)
Quality / MarginsPRU logoPRUCombined ratio 0.9 vs UNM's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
Stability / SafetyUNM logoUNMBeta 0.48 vs PRU's 0.97, lower leverage
DividendsPRU logoPRU5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs UNM's 2.2%
Momentum (1Y)PRU logoPRU+3.7% vs UNM's +3.3%
Efficiency (ROA)UNM logoUNM1.6% ROA vs PRU's 0.6%, ROIC 4.7% vs 10.0%

PRU vs UNM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PRUPrudential Financial, Inc.
FY 2025
Retirement
56.3%$16.7B
Group Insurance
22.9%$6.8B
Individual Life
20.7%$6.1B
UNMUnum Group
FY 2025
Unum US
60.7%$7.9B
Colonial Life
15.4%$2.0B
Closed Block
14.5%$1.9B
Unum International
9.5%$1.2B

PRU vs UNM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUNMLAGGINGPRU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UNM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

PRU is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.8B annually — 4.6x UNM's $13.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.9% (UNM) to 5.6% (PRU).

MetricPRU logoPRUPrudential Financ…UNM logoUNMUnum Group
RevenueTrailing 12 months$61.8B$13.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5.4B$1.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3.5B$781M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9.8B$539M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.8%+33.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.2%+7.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.6%+5.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.8%+4.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.3%+9.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-12.8%+33.0%
UNM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.8x trailing earnings, PRU trades at a 48% valuation discount to UNM's 18.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRU's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UNM's 15.8x.

MetricPRU logoPRUPrudential Financ…UNM logoUNMUnum Group
Market CapShares × price$34.9B$13.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$38.1B$16.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.80x18.75x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.40x9.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate9.72x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.76x15.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.57x0.99x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.98x1.25x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.56x23.34x
PRU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UNM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

PRU delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for UNM. UNM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRU's 0.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRU scores 7/9 vs UNM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPRU logoPRUPrudential Financ…UNM logoUNMUnum Group
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.3%+7.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.6%+1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.0%+4.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.9%+1.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.65x0.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.2B$3.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$19.7B$158M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$23.0B$3.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.76x5.48x
UNM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UNM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UNM five years ago would be worth $29,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,875 for PRU. Over the past 12 months, PRU leads with a +3.7% total return vs UNM's +3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UNM at 23.9% vs PRU's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPRU logoPRUPrudential Financ…UNM logoUNMUnum Group
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.8%+5.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+3.7%+3.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+40.4%+90.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.7%+192.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.9%+175.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.0%+23.9%
UNM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

UNM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

UNM is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRU's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UNM currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs PRU's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPRU logoPRUPrudential Financ…UNM logoUNMUnum Group
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.97x0.48x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$119.76$83.13
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$91.89$68.28
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.6%+96.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.564.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.3M1.5M
UNM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PRU and UNM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates PRU as "Hold" and UNM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.1% upside for UNM (target: $98) vs 4.0% for PRU (target: $104). For income investors, PRU offers the higher dividend yield at 5.50% vs UNM's 2.21%.

MetricPRU logoPRUPrudential Financ…UNM logoUNMUnum Group
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$104.13$98.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3730
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.5%+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises820
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.50$1.77
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.9%+7.8%
Evenly matched — PRU and UNM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

UNM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallUnum Group (UNM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PRU vs UNM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PRU or UNM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Unum Group (UNM) is the stronger pick with 2.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 0% for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) a "Hold" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PRU or UNM?

On trailing P/E, Prudential Financial, Inc.

(PRU) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Unum Group at 18. 8x. On forward P/E, Prudential Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PRU or UNM?

Over the past 5 years, Unum Group (UNM) delivered a total return of +192.

1%, compared to +18. 7% for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UNM returned +175. 7% versus PRU's +88. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PRU or UNM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Unum Group (UNM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

48β versus Prudential Financial, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning PRU is approximately 103% more volatile than UNM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Unum Group (UNM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 65% for Prudential Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PRU or UNM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Unum Group (UNM) is pulling ahead at 2.

1% versus -14. 0% for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Prudential Financial, Inc. grew EPS 36. 3% year-over-year, compared to -54. 8% for Unum Group. Over a 3-year CAGR, UNM leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PRU or UNM?

Prudential Financial, Inc.

(PRU) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 5. 7% for Unum Group — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRU leads at 7. 9% versus 7. 2% for UNM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRU leads at 42. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PRU or UNM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Prudential Financial, Inc.

(PRU) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 9. 2x for Unum Group — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UNM: 22. 1% to $98. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PRU or UNM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 2. 2% for Unum Group (UNM).

09

Is PRU or UNM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Unum Group (UNM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

48), 2. 2% yield, +175. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UNM: +175. 7%, PRU: +88. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PRU and UNM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PRU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UNM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

PRU

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UNM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PRU and UNM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PRU: 6.3% · UNM: 9.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(PRU: 5.6% · UNM: 5.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PRU: 9.8x · UNM: 18.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.