Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PTLO vs BROS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
PTLO vs BROS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $324M | $7.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $738M | $1.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $81M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 20.9x | 66.5x |
| Total Debt | $999M | $1.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $269M |
PTLO vs BROS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) | 100 | 11.8 | -88.2% |
| Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) | 100 | 77.5 | -22.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTLO vs BROS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTLO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.35
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, current ratio 0.27x
- Beta 1.35, current ratio 0.27x
BROS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 103.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.4%
- 61.0% 10Y total return vs PTLO's -84.6%
- 27.9% revenue growth vs PTLO's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% revenue growth vs PTLO's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.9x vs 66.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.6% margin vs PTLO's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.35 vs BROS's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.9% vs PTLO's -57.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs PTLO's 1.0%, ROIC 7.7% vs 3.0% |
PTLO vs BROS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PTLO vs BROS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BROS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BROS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 2.4x PTLO's $738M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.6% (BROS) to 2.1% (PTLO). On growth, BROS holds the edge at +30.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $738M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $244M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $81M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $148M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +8.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | +30.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -120.0% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PTLO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.6x trailing earnings, PTLO trades at a 82% valuation discount to BROS's 93.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTLO's 16.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BROS's 30.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $324M | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.63x | 93.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.94x | 66.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.23x | 30.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 4.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 8.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 137.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BROS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BROS delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $3 for PTLO. BROS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PTLO's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BROS scores 6/9 vs PTLO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $980M | $820M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $269M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $999M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.78x | 9.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BROS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BROS five years ago would be worth $16,101 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for PTLO. Over the past 12 months, BROS leads with a -0.9% total return vs PTLO's -57.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BROS at 22.3% vs PTLO's -39.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.2% | -5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.1% | -0.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.8% | +83.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.6% | +61.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.6% | +61.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.4% | +22.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PTLO and BROS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTLO is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BROS's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BROS currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs PTLO's 33.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.55 | $77.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.41 | $44.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.1% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.7 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PTLO as "Hold" and BROS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.1% upside for PTLO (target: $7) vs 26.1% for BROS (target: $74).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.92 | $74.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BROS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PTLO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PTLO vs BROS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTLO or BROS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTLO or BROS?
On trailing P/E, Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) is the cheapest at 16. 6x versus Dutch Bros Inc. at 93. 7x. On forward P/E, Portillo's Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTLO or BROS?
Over the past 5 years, Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) delivered a total return of +61. 0%, compared to -84. 6% for Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BROS returned +61. 0% versus PTLO's -84. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTLO or BROS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus Dutch Bros Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning BROS is approximately 36% more volatile than PTLO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 121% versus 2% for Portillo's Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTLO or BROS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus 3. 0% for Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dutch Bros Inc. grew EPS 103. 2% year-over-year, compared to -41. 3% for Portillo's Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BROS leads at 30. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTLO or BROS?
Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 9% net margin versus 2. 6% for Portillo's Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BROS leads at 9. 8% versus 7. 0% for PTLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTLO leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTLO or BROS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) trades at 20. 9x forward P/E versus 66. 5x for Dutch Bros Inc. — 45. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PTLO: 54. 1% to $6. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTLO or BROS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PTLO or BROS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTLO: -84. 6%, BROS: +61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTLO and BROS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PTLO is a small-cap deep-value stock; BROS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.