SELF
Global Self Storage, Inc.
REIT - Industrial
Market Cap$62M
5Y Perf.+32.2%
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
EXR
Extra Space Storage Inc.
REIT - Industrial
Market Cap$30.38B
5Y Perf.+48.7%
CUBE
CubeSmart
REIT - Industrial
Market Cap$9.18B
5Y Perf.+41.5%
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SELF | EXR | CUBE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $62M | $30.38B | $9.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $3.38B | $1.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $974M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 28.4% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 21.6% | 44.1% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 30.6x | 30.9x | 28.4x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $14.97B | $3.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $139M | $6M |
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SELF
EXR
CUBE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Self Storage… (SELF) | 100 | 132.2 | +32.2% |
| Extra Space Storage… (EXR) | 100 | 148.7 | +48.7% |
| CubeSmart (CUBE) | 100 | 141.5 | +41.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SELF vs EXR vs CUBE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SELF leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CubeSmart is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SELF
Global Self Storage, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
SELF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 5.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, Low D/E 34.0%, current ratio 11.42x
- PEG 0.70 vs EXR's 7.11
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
EXR
Extra Space Storage Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
EXR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 107.1% 10Y total return vs SELF's 70.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
CUBE
CubeSmart
The Real Estate Income Play
CUBE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- 5.3% FFO/revenue growth vs EXR's 1.2%
- 28.9% margin vs SELF's 16.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CUBE | 5.3% FFO/revenue growth vs EXR's 1.2% |
| Value | SELF | Lower P/E (30.6x vs 30.9x), PEG 0.70 vs 7.11 |
| Quality / Margins | CUBE | 28.9% margin vs SELF's 16.0% |
| Stability / Safety | SELF | Beta 0.20 vs CUBE's 0.53, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SELF | 5.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CUBE's 5.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SELF | +12.2% vs CUBE's +0.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CUBE | 4.9% ROA vs SELF's 3.1%, ROIC 5.5% vs 3.5% |
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSELFLAGGINGCUBE
CUBECubeSmart
1leads
EXRExtra Space Storage I…
1leads
SELFGlobal Self Storage, …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs EXRvs CUBEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EXR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SELF5/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CUBE5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SELF4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SELF2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 265.8x SELF's $13M. CUBE is the more profitable business, keeping 28.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SELF's 16.0%. On growth, EXR holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SELFGlobal Self Stora… | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $3.4B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $2.2B | $597M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $974M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $1.8B | $611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +28.4% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +44.1% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +28.8% | +28.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +54.6% | +54.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.9% | +9.3% | +3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% | -7.7% |
EXR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SELF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.6x trailing earnings, CUBE trades at a 12% valuation discount to EXR's 31.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SELF offers better value at 0.70x vs EXR's 7.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | SELFGlobal Self Stora… | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $62M | $30.4B | $9.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $45.2B | $12.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.56x | 31.34x | 27.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.94x | 28.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.70x | 7.21x | 2.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.72x | 20.51x | 17.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.91x | 8.99x | 8.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 2.13x | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.04x | 16.61x | 16.20x |
SELF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBE delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $4 for SELF. SELF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CUBE's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SELF scores 6/9 vs CUBE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SELFGlobal Self Stora… | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +6.7% | +11.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +3.3% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +3.9% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +5.4% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 1.05x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $14.8B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $139M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $15.0B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.39x | 2.68x | 3.90x |
CUBE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SELF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SELF five years ago would be worth $13,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,856 for CUBE. Over the past 12 months, SELF leads with a +12.2% total return vs CUBE's +0.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SELF at 8.2% vs CUBE's 0.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SELFGlobal Self Stora… | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.3% | +11.1% | +16.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | +2.1% | +0.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +4.0% | +0.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.4% | +19.8% | +18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.0% | +107.1% | +75.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +1.3% | +0.0% |
SELF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SELF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SELF is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CUBE's 0.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | SELFGlobal Self Stora… | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.52x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.89 | $155.19 | $44.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.73 | $125.71 | $35.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +92.7% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.8 | 49.0 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 1.1M | 2.2M |
SELF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SELF and CUBE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EXR as "Hold", CUBE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.7% upside for EXR (target: $149) vs 3.0% for CUBE (target: $42). For income investors, SELF offers the higher dividend yield at 5.31% vs EXR's 4.51%.
| Metric | SELFGlobal Self Stora… | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $149.13 | $41.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +4.5% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $6.49 | $2.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.4% |
Evenly matched — SELF and CUBE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SELF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). EXR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
Best OverallGlobal Self Storage, Inc. (SELF)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SELF or EXR or CUBE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the stronger pick with 5.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). CubeSmart (CUBE) offers the better valuation at 27. 6x trailing P/E (28. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SELF or EXR or CUBE?
On trailing P/E, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the cheapest at 27.
6x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, CubeSmart is actually cheaper at 28. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CubeSmart wins at 2. 49x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. 's 7. 11x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SELF or EXR or CUBE?
Over the past 5 years, Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) delivered a total return of +39. 4%, compared to +18. 6% for CubeSmart (CUBE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXR returned +107. 1% versus SELF's +70. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SELF or EXR or CUBE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus CubeSmart's 0. 53β — meaning CUBE is approximately 170% more volatile than SELF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 127% for CubeSmart — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SELF or EXR or CUBE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CubeSmart (CUBE) is pulling ahead at 5.
3% versus 1. 2% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Extra Space Storage Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for CubeSmart. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXR leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SELF or EXR or CUBE?
CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
7% net margin versus 16. 0% for Global Self Storage, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXR leads at 44. 1% versus 20. 5% for SELF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SELF leads at 36. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SELF or EXR or CUBE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 49x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. 's 7. 11x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, CubeSmart (CUBE) trades at 28. 4x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Extra Space Storage Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXR: 3. 7% to $149. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — SELF or EXR or CUBE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 4. 5% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR).
09Is SELF or EXR or CUBE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 5. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SELF: +70. 0%, CUBE: +75. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SELF and EXR and CUBE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SELF: -0.9% · EXR: 9.3%)Net Margin>
%
(SELF: 16.0% · EXR: 28.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SELF: 30.6x · EXR: 31.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.