Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SGC vs UNFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Distribution
SGC vs UNFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $187M | $3.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $570M | $31.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-78M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 13.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 0.3% |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $3.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $44M |
SGC vs UNFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Superior Group of C… (SGC) | 100 | 119.9 | +19.9% |
| United Natural Food… (UNFI) | 100 | 255.2 | +155.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGC vs UNFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 52.7%, current ratio 2.66x
- 1.5% margin vs UNFI's -0.2%
UNFI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.6%, EPS growth -3.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- 48.7% 10Y total return vs SGC's -10.6%
- Beta 0.97, current ratio 1.32x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.6% revenue growth vs SGC's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.2x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs UNFI's -0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs SGC's 1.15 | |
| Dividends | 4.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.9% vs SGC's +21.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.1% ROA vs UNFI's -1.0%, ROIC 3.6% vs -0.5% |
SGC vs UNFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SGC vs UNFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SGC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UNFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $31.5B annually — 55.3x SGC's $570M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.5% (SGC) to -0.2% (UNFI). On growth, SGC holds the edge at +2.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $570M | $31.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $417M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | -$78M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $395M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +13.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +0.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +1.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SGC and UNFI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SGC's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UNFI's 23.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $187M | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $265M | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.00x | -26.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.43x | 20.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.29x | 23.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 0.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 2.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.86x | 13.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SGC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SGC delivers a 4.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-5 for UNFI. SGC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UNFI's 2.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SGC scores 5/9 vs UNFI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | -5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | -0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 2.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $78M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $44M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.93x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UNFI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UNFI five years ago would be worth $14,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,659 for SGC. Over the past 12 months, UNFI leads with a +93.9% total return vs SGC's +21.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UNFI at 24.4% vs SGC's 21.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.8% | +55.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.1% | +93.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.5% | +92.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.4% | +42.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.6% | +48.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.5% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
UNFI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UNFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SGC's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UNFI currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs SGC's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.78 | $52.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.30 | $20.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 69.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 698K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SGC as "Buy" and UNFI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 75.6% upside for SGC (target: $21) vs -23.4% for UNFI (target: $40). SGC is the only dividend payer here at 4.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $39.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.4% | 0.0% |
SGC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UNFI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SGC vs UNFI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGC or UNFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Natural Foods, Inc.
(UNFI) is the stronger pick with 2. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC). Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) offers the better valuation at 26. 0x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGC or UNFI?
On forward P/E, United Natural Foods, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 20. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGC or UNFI?
Over the past 5 years, United Natural Foods, Inc.
(UNFI) delivered a total return of +42. 5%, compared to -43. 4% for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UNFI returned +48. 7% versus SGC's -10. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGC or UNFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Natural Foods, Inc.
(UNFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Superior Group of Companies, Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning SGC is approximately 19% more volatile than UNFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 2% for United Natural Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGC or UNFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Natural Foods, Inc.
(UNFI) is pulling ahead at 2. 6% versus 0. 1% for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Natural Foods, Inc. grew EPS -3. 7% year-over-year, compared to -37. 0% for Superior Group of Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UNFI leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGC or UNFI?
Superior Group of Companies, Inc.
(SGC) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 2% net margin versus -0. 4% for United Natural Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SGC leads at 2. 4% versus -0. 1% for UNFI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGC leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGC or UNFI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Natural Foods, Inc.
(UNFI) trades at 20. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SGC: 75. 6% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGC or UNFI?
In this comparison, SGC (4.
9% yield) pays a dividend. UNFI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SGC or UNFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Superior Group of Companies, Inc.
(SGC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 4. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGC: -10. 2%, UNFI: +48. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGC and UNFI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SGC (Consumer Cyclical) and UNFI (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SGC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UNFI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SGC pays a dividend while UNFI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.