Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SION vs VRTX vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
SION vs VRTX vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $1.94B | $108.78B | $362.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $12.26B | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-75M | $4.34B | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.3% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 39.0% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.2x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $3.88B | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $5.09B | $5.23B |
SION vs VRTX vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sionna Therapeutics… (SION) | 100 | 314.5 | +214.5% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 88.6 | -11.4% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 96.9 | -3.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SION vs VRTX vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SION is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 20.61x
- +239.3% vs VRTX's -5.0%
VRTX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 8.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
- 399.9% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 306.7%
- 9.6% revenue growth vs ABBV's 8.6%
ABBV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- Beta 0.34, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.67x
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 22.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% revenue growth vs ABBV's 8.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs SION's 4.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs SION's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +239.3% vs VRTX's -5.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.1% ROA vs SION's -21.7%, ROIC 23.0% vs -204.4% |
SION vs VRTX vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SION vs VRTX vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 1 of 6 categories
VRTX leads 1 • SION leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VRTX and ABBV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and SION operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABBV's 6.9%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $12.3B | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$89M | $4.9B | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$75M | $4.3B | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67M | $3.7B | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +86.3% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +39.0% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +35.4% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +30.3% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.8% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.1% | +61.4% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.9x trailing earnings, VRTX trades at a 68% valuation discount to ABBV's 86.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VRTX's 21.7x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $108.8B | $362.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $107.6B | $426.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.03x | 27.91x | 86.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.18x | 14.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.37x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.65x | 15.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 9.01x | 5.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.64x | 5.91x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 34.06x | 20.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-23 for SION. SION carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRTX's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs VRTX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.9% | +23.9% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.7% | +17.1% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | +23.0% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.4% | +23.1% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.21x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$50M | -$1.2B | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $5.1B | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $3.9B | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 488.09x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SION leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,276 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,316 for SION. Over the past 12 months, SION leads with a +239.3% total return vs VRTX's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SION at 20.1% vs VRTX's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.4% | -5.4% | -9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +239.3% | -5.0% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.2% | +24.3% | +52.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.2% | +100.6% | +102.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.2% | +399.9% | +306.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.1% | +7.5% | +15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SION and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SION's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SION currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs ABBV's 83.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.82x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.46 | $507.92 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.77 | $362.50 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +84.2% | +83.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 40.4 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 353K | 1.2M | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SION as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.1% upside for VRTX (target: $552) vs 6.8% for SION (target: $46). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.25 | $552.27 | $256.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 56 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +0.3% |
ABBV leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). VRTX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SION vs VRTX vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SION or VRTX or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the stronger pick with 9.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 6% for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sionna Therapeutics, Inc. (SION) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SION or VRTX or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the cheapest at 27.
9x versus AbbVie Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SION or VRTX or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +102. 8%, compared to +73. 2% for Sionna Therapeutics, Inc. (SION). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTX returned +382. 6% versus SION's +73. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SION or VRTX or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Sionna Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning SION is approximately 236% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sionna Therapeutics, Inc. (SION) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 21% for Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SION or VRTX or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is pulling ahead at 9.
6% versus 8. 6% for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to -34. 3% for Sionna Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRTX leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SION or VRTX or ABBV?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Sionna Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus 0. 0% for SION. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRTX leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SION or VRTX or ABBV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRTX: 29. 1% to $552. 27.
08Which pays a better dividend — SION or VRTX or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SION, VRTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SION or VRTX or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, SION: +73. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SION and VRTX and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SION is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV pays a dividend while SION, VRTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.