STX
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Computer Hardware
Market Cap$171.50B
5Y Perf.+1382.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
STX vs PSTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PSTG
Pure Storage, Inc.
Computer Hardware
Market Cap$21.99B
5Y Perf.+235.4%
STX vs PSTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | STX | PSTG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $171.50B | $21.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.01B | $3.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.38B | $188M |
| Gross Margin | 41.5% | 70.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.3% | 3.1% |
| Forward P/E | 53.3x | 29.2x |
| Total Debt | $5.37B | $216M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $891M | $855M |
STX vs PSTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
STX
PSTG
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seagate Technology … (STX) | 100 | 1482.7 | +1382.7% |
| Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) | 100 | 335.4 | +235.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STX vs PSTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: STX leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Pure Storage, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
STX
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
The Income Pick
STX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.04, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 38.9%, EPS growth 328.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.9%
- 41.6% 10Y total return vs PSTG's 374.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PSTG
Pure Storage, Inc.
The Value Play
PSTG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (29.2x vs 53.3x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | STX | 38.9% revenue growth vs PSTG's 15.6% |
| Value | PSTG | Lower P/E (29.2x vs 53.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | STX | 21.6% margin vs PSTG's 5.1% |
| Stability / Safety | STX | Beta 2.04 vs PSTG's 2.32 |
| Dividends | STX | 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | STX | +7.4% vs PSTG's +40.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | STX | 27.9% ROA vs PSTG's 4.0%, ROIC 41.4% vs 10.3% |
STX vs PSTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
STX vs PSTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSTXLAGGINGPSTG
PSTGPure Storage, Inc.
1leads
STXSeagate Technology Ho…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PSTGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
STX4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PSTG4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
STX5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
STX6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
STX2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STX is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 3.0x PSTG's $3.7B. STX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSTG's 5.1%. On growth, STX holds the edge at +44.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | STXSeagate Technolog… | PSTGPure Storage, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.0B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.4B | $263M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.4B | $188M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $256M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.5% | +70.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.3% | +3.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +7.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.1% | +20.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.3% | +141.7% |
STX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PSTG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 116.2x trailing earnings, STX trades at a 18% valuation discount to PSTG's 142.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSTG's 81.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STX's 82.2x.
| Metric | STXSeagate Technolog… | PSTGPure Storage, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $171.5B | $22.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $176.0B | $21.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 116.16x | 142.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 53.34x | 29.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.44x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 82.19x | 81.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 18.85x | 6.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 16.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 209.65x | 35.71x |
PSTG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STX delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $13 for PSTG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STX scores 7/9 vs PSTG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | STXSeagate Technolog… | PSTGPure Storage, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +27.9% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +41.4% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +37.7% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | -$639M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $891M | $855M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.4B | $216M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.54x | 28.04x |
STX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STX five years ago would be worth $88,957 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $36,656 for PSTG. Over the past 12 months, STX leads with a +740.6% total return vs PSTG's +40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STX at 141.7% vs PSTG's 43.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | STXSeagate Technolog… | PSTGPure Storage, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +173.8% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +740.6% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1312.3% | +194.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +789.6% | +266.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4164.7% | +374.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +141.7% | +43.3% |
STX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STX is the less volatile stock with a 2.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSTG's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STX currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs PSTG's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | STXSeagate Technolog… | PSTGPure Storage, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 2.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $792.01 | $100.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $91.92 | $46.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +66.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 86.4 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 2.9M |
STX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STX as "Buy" and PSTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.4% upside for PSTG (target: $87) vs -20.7% for STX (target: $624). STX is the only dividend payer here at 0.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | STXSeagate Technolog… | PSTGPure Storage, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $623.71 | $86.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.76 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
STX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSTG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallSeagate Technology Holdings… (STX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
STX vs PSTG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STX or PSTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) is the stronger pick with 38.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 6% for Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG). Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) offers the better valuation at 116. 2x trailing P/E (53. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STX or PSTG?
On trailing P/E, Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) is the cheapest at 116.
2x versus Pure Storage, Inc. at 142. 5x. On forward P/E, Pure Storage, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STX or PSTG?
Over the past 5 years, Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) delivered a total return of +789.
6%, compared to +266. 6% for Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STX returned +41. 6% versus PSTG's +374. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STX or PSTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
04β versus Pure Storage, Inc. 's 2. 32β — meaning PSTG is approximately 14% more volatile than STX relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — STX or PSTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) is pulling ahead at 38.
9% versus 15. 6% for Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seagate Technology Holdings plc grew EPS 328. 5% year-over-year, compared to 51. 6% for Pure Storage, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSTG leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STX or PSTG?
Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
1% net margin versus 5. 1% for Pure Storage, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STX leads at 20. 8% versus 3. 1% for PSTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSTG leads at 70. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STX or PSTG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pure Storage, Inc.
(PSTG) trades at 29. 2x forward P/E versus 53. 3x for Seagate Technology Holdings plc — 24. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PSTG: 29. 4% to $86. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — STX or PSTG?
In this comparison, STX (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. PSTG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STX or PSTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pure Storage, Inc.
(PSTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+374. 6% 10Y return). Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PSTG: +374. 6%, STX: +41. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STX and PSTG?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(STX: 44.1% · PSTG: 20.4%)Net Margin>
%
(STX: 21.6% · PSTG: 5.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(STX: 116.2x · PSTG: 142.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.