SUUN vs RUN vs SHLS

For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 9% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrun Inc. (RUN) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) delivered a total return of -69. 8%, compared to -87. 2% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RUN returned +86. 7% versus SUUN's -87. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PowerBank Corporation (SUUN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

75β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 65% more volatile than SUUN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 4% for PowerBank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -28. 9% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -654. 5% for PowerBank Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SUUN leads at 31. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -74. 7% for PowerBank Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -20. 3% for SUUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHLS leads at 35. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

(SHLS) trades at 19. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Sunrun Inc. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RUN: 31. 4% to $18. 14.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, PowerBank Corporation (SUUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUUN: -87. 2%, SHLS: -74. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SUUN (Utilities) and RUN (Energy) and SHLS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SUUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.