Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TH vs WSC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
TH vs WSC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $1.58B | $4.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $321M | $2.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | 21.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $4.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $15M |
TH vs WSC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target Hospitality … (TH) | 100 | 663.4 | +563.4% |
| WillScot Holdings C… (WSC) | 100 | 175.4 | +75.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TH vs WSC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 0.87x
- Beta 0.79, current ratio 0.87x
WSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.8%, EPS growth -293.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
- 145.9% 10Y total return vs TH's 60.3%
- -4.8% revenue growth vs TH's -17.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.8% revenue growth vs TH's -17.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.3% margin vs TH's -11.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.8% vs WSC's -10.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.9% ROA vs TH's -6.9%, ROIC 7.4% vs -5.8% |
TH vs WSC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TH vs WSC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 7.1x TH's $321M. WSC is the more profitable business, keeping -2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TH's -11.6%. On growth, TH holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $321M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $831M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $521M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +22.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.3% | -6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WSC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WSC's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TH's 38.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $8.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -42.68x | -80.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 38.18x | 9.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.91x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.04x | 4.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 223.42x | 5.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WSC delivers a -5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-9 for TH. TH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WSC's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TH scores 5/9 vs WSC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.2% | -5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.8% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.8% | +9.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 4.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $4.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.09x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TH five years ago would be worth $60,267 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,139 for WSC. Over the past 12 months, TH leads with a +117.8% total return vs WSC's -10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TH at 8.8% vs WSC's -18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +94.9% | +20.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +117.8% | -10.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | -46.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +502.7% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.3% | +145.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | -18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
TH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TH is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSC's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TH currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs WSC's 73.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 2.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.12 | $31.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.97 | $14.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 65.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
TH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TH as "Buy" and WSC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1.2% upside for WSC (target: $24) vs -8.2% for TH (target: $15). WSC is the only dividend payer here at 1.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $23.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.28 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
WSC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TH leads in 3 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
TH vs WSC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TH or WSC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) is the stronger pick with -4.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 0% for Target Hospitality Corp. (TH). Analysts rate Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TH or WSC?
Over the past 5 years, Target Hospitality Corp.
(TH) delivered a total return of +502. 7%, compared to -18. 6% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSC returned +145. 9% versus TH's +60. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TH or WSC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Target Hospitality Corp.
(TH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus WillScot Holdings Corporation's 2. 06β — meaning WSC is approximately 161% more volatile than TH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TH or WSC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) is pulling ahead at -4.
8% versus -17. 0% for Target Hospitality Corp. (TH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Target Hospitality Corp. grew EPS -152. 9% year-over-year, compared to -293. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WSC leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TH or WSC?
WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) is the more profitable company, earning -2.
3% net margin versus -11. 6% for Target Hospitality Corp. — meaning it keeps -2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSC leads at 21. 4% versus -10. 0% for TH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSC leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TH or WSC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WSC: 1.
2% to $23. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — TH or WSC?
In this comparison, WSC (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. TH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TH or WSC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Target Hospitality Corp.
(TH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79)). WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TH: +60. 3%, WSC: +145. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TH and WSC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WSC pays a dividend while TH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.