Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WSC vs URI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
WSC vs URI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $4.24B | $60.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.28B | $16.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $2.51B |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 36.3% |
| Operating Margin | 21.2% | 24.7% |
| Forward P/E | 22.2x | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.14B | $16.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $459M |
WSC vs URI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WillScot Holdings C… (WSC) | 100 | 175.4 | +75.4% |
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 694.4 | +594.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WSC vs URI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WSC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs URI's 0.7%
URI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth -0.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 15.0% 10Y total return vs WSC's 145.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.9% revenue growth vs WSC's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.6x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs WSC's -2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs URI's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.1% vs WSC's -10.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs WSC's -0.9%, ROIC 12.4% vs 7.4% |
WSC vs URI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WSC vs URI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 7.2x WSC's $2.3B. URI is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSC's -2.3%. On growth, URI holds the edge at +7.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $16.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $831M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $521M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +36.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +24.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | +5.6% |
Valuation Metrics
WSC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WSC's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than URI's 10.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $60.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.4B | $76.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -80.69x | 24.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.16x | 20.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.10x | 10.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 3.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.98x | 6.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.74x | 91.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
URI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
URI delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-5 for WSC. URI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WSC's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), URI scores 4/9 vs WSC's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.3% | +27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +15.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.84x | 1.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.1B | $16.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $459M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $16.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.73x | 5.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
URI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in URI five years ago would be worth $28,784 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,139 for WSC. Over the past 12 months, URI leads with a +49.1% total return vs WSC's -10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors URI at 42.4% vs WSC's -18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.5% | +14.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.8% | +49.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.4% | +188.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.6% | +187.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.9% | +1503.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.7% | +42.4% |
Risk & Volatility
URI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
URI is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSC's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. URI currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs WSC's 73.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.06x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.88 | $1021.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.91 | $645.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +94.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 65.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 563K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WSC and URI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WSC as "Buy" and URI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.5% upside for URI (target: $1037) vs 1.2% for WSC (target: $24). For income investors, WSC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs URI's 0.74%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.67 | $1037.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $7.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +3.3% |
URI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WSC vs URI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WSC or URI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger pick with 4. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). United Rentals, Inc. (URI) offers the better valuation at 25. 0x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WSC or URI?
On forward P/E, United Rentals, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 20. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WSC or URI?
Over the past 5 years, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) delivered a total return of +187. 8%, compared to -18. 6% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1503% versus WSC's +145. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WSC or URI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus WillScot Holdings Corporation's 2. 06β — meaning WSC is approximately 74% more volatile than URI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 184% versus 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WSC or URI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is pulling ahead at 4. 9% versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Rentals, Inc. grew EPS -0. 2% year-over-year, compared to -293. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, URI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WSC or URI?
United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -2. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: URI leads at 24. 7% versus 21. 4% for WSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSC leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WSC or URI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) trades at 20. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for WillScot Holdings Corporation — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for URI: 7. 5% to $1037. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — WSC or URI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 7% for United Rentals, Inc. (URI).
09Is WSC or URI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 0. 7% yield, +1503% 10Y return). WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1503%, WSC: +145. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WSC and URI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.