Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TPET vs CALI vs TUSK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TPET
Trio Petroleum Corp.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-98.9%
CALI
China Auto Logistics Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$203M
5Y Perf.+0.7%
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

Conglomerates

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$113M
5Y Perf.-36.3%

TPET vs CALI vs TUSK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TPET logoTPET
CALI logoCALI
TUSK logoTUSK
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionAuto - DealershipsConglomerates
Market Cap$4M$203M$113M
Revenue (TTM)$399K$514M$103M
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$-1M$-64M
Gross Margin50.0%0.4%2.7%
Operating Margin-13.2%-0.2%-27.9%
Forward P/E50.9x23.5x
Total Debt$467K$60M$3M
Cash & Equiv.$882K$3M$102M

TPET vs CALI vs TUSKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TPET
CALI
TUSK
StockApr 23May 26Return
Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET)1001.1-98.9%
China Auto Logistic… (CALI)100100.7+0.7%
Mammoth Energy Serv… (TUSK)10063.7-36.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TPET vs CALI vs TUSK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CALI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Trio Petroleum Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TPET
Trio Petroleum Corp.
The Growth Leader

TPET is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 87.0% revenue growth vs TUSK's -76.4%
Best for: growth
CALI
China Auto Logistics Inc.
The Income Pick

CALI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.01
  • Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 133.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
  • 49.7% 10Y total return vs TUSK's -78.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
The Value Play

TUSK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (23.5x vs 50.9x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTPET logoTPET87.0% revenue growth vs TUSK's -76.4%
ValueTUSK logoTUSKLower P/E (23.5x vs 50.9x)
Quality / MarginsCALI logoCALI-0.3% margin vs TPET's -18.3%
Stability / SafetyCALI logoCALIBeta 0.01 vs TUSK's 0.66
DividendsTieNone of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CALI logoCALI+2.9% vs TPET's -63.2%
Efficiency (ROA)CALI logoCALI-0.9% ROA vs TPET's -54.7%, ROIC 0.1% vs -38.5%

TPET vs CALI vs TUSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TPETTrio Petroleum Corp.
FY 2025
Oil Sales
100.0%$398,734
CALIChina Auto Logistics Inc.
FY 2016
Automobiles
99.1%$463M
Financing Services
0.9%$4M
Other Services
0.0%$33,660
TUSKMammoth Energy Services, Inc.
FY 2024
Product
100.0%$19M

TPET vs CALI vs TUSK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCALILAGGINGTUSK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CALI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CALI is the larger business by revenue, generating $514M annually — 1290.1x TPET's $398,734. CALI is the more profitable business, keeping -0.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPET's -18.3%. On growth, TPET holds the edge at +123.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…CALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…TUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$398,734$514M$103M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M-$969,068-$15M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M-$1M-$64M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M$466,701-$54M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.0%+0.4%+2.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.2%-0.2%-27.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-18.3%-0.3%-61.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.7%+0.1%-52.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+123.0%+30.1%-82.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.5%-3.6%+156.3%
CALI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TPET leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 23.5x trailing earnings, TUSK trades at a 54% valuation discount to CALI's 50.9x P/E.

MetricTPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…CALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…TUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…
Market CapShares × price$4M$203M$113M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M$260M$15M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.58x50.92x23.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple829.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue10.52x0.44x2.56x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.37x8.63x0.44x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
TPET leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CALI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CALI delivers a -5.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-63 for TPET. TUSK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CALI's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CALI scores 6/9 vs TUSK's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…CALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…TUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-63.5%-5.4%-25.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-54.7%-0.9%-18.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-38.5%+0.1%-25.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-51.6%+0.8%-23.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9565
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x2.55x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$414,983$57M-$99M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$882,162$3M$102M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$467,179$60M$3M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.03x0.35x-82.84x
CALI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CALI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CALI five years ago would be worth $5,429,458,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $102 for TPET. Over the past 12 months, CALI leads with a +2.9% total return vs TPET's -63.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CALI at 2.8% vs TPET's -77.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…CALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…TUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-43.4%+0.4%+19.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-63.2%+2.9%-6.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%+8.5%-36.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%+54294486.5%-35.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%+4974.3%-78.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-77.3%+2.8%-14.1%
CALI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TPET and CALI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TPET is the less volatile stock with a -2.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TUSK's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CALI currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs TPET's 18.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…CALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…TUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-2.78x0.01x0.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.50$50.79$3.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.35$50.04$1.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+18.5%+99.3%+75.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.142.547.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded44.1M84K296K
Evenly matched — TPET and CALI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricTPET logoTPETTrio Petroleum Co…CALI logoCALIChina Auto Logist…TUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts13
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CALI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TPET leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallChina Auto Logistics Inc. (CALI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TPET vs CALI vs TUSK: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TPET or CALI or TUSK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Trio Petroleum Corp.

(TPET) is the stronger pick with 87. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -76. 4% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) a "Hold" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TPET or CALI or TUSK?

On trailing P/E, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

(TUSK) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus China Auto Logistics Inc. at 50. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TPET or CALI or TUSK?

Over the past 5 years, China Auto Logistics Inc.

(CALI) delivered a total return of +542945%, compared to -99. 0% for Trio Petroleum Corp. (TPET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALI returned +49. 7% versus TPET's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TPET or CALI or TUSK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trio Petroleum Corp.

(TPET) is the lower-risk stock at -2. 78β versus Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning TUSK is approximately -124% more volatile than TPET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for China Auto Logistics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TPET or CALI or TUSK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trio Petroleum Corp.

(TPET) is pulling ahead at 87. 0% versus -76. 4% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Auto Logistics Inc. grew EPS 133. 2% year-over-year, compared to 81. 5% for Trio Petroleum Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CALI leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TPET or CALI or TUSK?

China Auto Logistics Inc.

(CALI) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -1826. 3% for Trio Petroleum Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CALI leads at 0. 1% versus -1322. 2% for TPET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TUSK leads at 45. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — TPET or CALI or TUSK?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is TPET or CALI or TUSK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Trio Petroleum Corp.

(TPET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -2. 78)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPET: -99. 0%, TUSK: -78. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between TPET and CALI and TUSK?

These companies operate in different sectors (TPET (Energy) and CALI (Consumer Cyclical) and TUSK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TPET is a small-cap high-growth stock; CALI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TUSK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TPET

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 61%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CALI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TUSK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TPET and CALI and TUSK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TPET: 123.0% · CALI: 30.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.