Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $145M | $271M | $601M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.14B | $3.04B | $906M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-192M | $-170M | $105M |
| Gross Margin | -1.1% | 18.1% | 15.4% |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | 4.2% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | 2.5x | — | 4.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.00B | $789M | $298M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $233M | $212M |
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| Conduent Incorporat… (CNDT) | 100 | 23.3 | -76.7% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 19.5 | -80.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTEC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (2.5x vs 4.8x)
CNDT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.72, yield 3.6%
- 3.6% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
- -14.6% vs TASK's -25.9%
TASK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- -66.8% 10Y total return vs TTEC's -61.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 49.6%, current ratio 3.12x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs CNDT's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.5x vs 4.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.6% margin vs TTEC's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs TTEC's 1.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -14.6% vs TASK's -25.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.3% ROA vs TTEC's -23.3%, ROIC 16.3% vs -7.6% |
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TASK leads in 3 of 6 categories
CNDT leads 2 • TTEC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TASK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 3.4x TASK's $906M. TASK is the more profitable business, keeping 11.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTEC's -9.0%. On growth, TTEC holds the edge at +0.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $3.0B | $906M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $321M | $188M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$192M | -$170M | $105M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $29M | -$147M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +18.1% | +15.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +4.2% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | -5.6% | +11.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | -4.8% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | -3.8% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -86.8% | -146.0% | +13.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CNDT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CNDT's 2.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TASK's 3.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $145M | $271M | $601M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $827M | $687M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.75x | -1.54x | 6.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.46x | — | 4.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.51x | 3.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 0.09x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.10x | 0.34x | 1.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TASK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TASK delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-147 for TTEC. TASK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTEC's 7.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TASK scores 7/9 vs CNDT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -147.2% | -20.6% | +21.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.3% | -7.1% | +10.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.6% | +7.2% | +16.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.5% | +7.6% | +16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.65x | 0.95x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $917M | $556M | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $233M | $212M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $789M | $298M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.74x | -1.85x | 7.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TASK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TASK five years ago would be worth $3,323 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $554 for TTEC. Over the past 12 months, CNDT leads with a -14.6% total return vs TASK's -25.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TASK at -5.5% vs TTEC's -52.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.5% | -7.9% | -9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.4% | -14.6% | -25.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | -39.0% | -15.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -76.1% | -66.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.8% | -89.1% | -66.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.2% | -15.2% | -5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNDT and TASK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TASK is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTEC's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNDT currently trades 58.7% from its 52-week high vs TASK's 36.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.72x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.60 | $2.98 | $18.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.98 | $1.15 | $6.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.2% | +58.7% | +36.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 64.9 | 35.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 669K | 1.3M | 724K |
Analyst Outlook
CNDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTEC as "Hold", CNDT as "Hold", TASK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1046.6% upside for TTEC (target: $34) vs 102.1% for TASK (target: $14). CNDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.17 | — | $13.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 8 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.06 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.7% | +4.6% |
TASK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNDT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTEC or CNDT or TASK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTEC or CNDT or TASK?
On forward P/E, TTEC Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 2. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTEC or CNDT or TASK?
Over the past 5 years, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) delivered a total return of -66. 8%, compared to -94. 5% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTEC returned -61. 8% versus CNDT's -89. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTEC or CNDT or TASK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus TTEC Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning TTEC is approximately 64% more volatile than TASK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 8% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTEC or CNDT or TASK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -151. 1% for Conduent Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TASK leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTEC or CNDT or TASK?
TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus -9. 0% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TASK leads at 11. 9% versus -5. 5% for TTEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TASK leads at 32. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTEC or CNDT or TASK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TTEC Holdings, Inc.
(TTEC) trades at 2. 5x forward P/E versus 4. 8x for TaskUs, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTEC: 1046. 6% to $34. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTEC or CNDT or TASK?
In this comparison, CNDT (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. TTEC, TASK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TTEC or CNDT or TASK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12)). TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TASK: -66. 8%, TTEC: -61. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTEC and CNDT and TASK?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TTEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNDT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock. CNDT pays a dividend while TTEC, TASK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.