Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
USB vs PNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
USB vs PNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $86.46B | $89.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42.86B | $33.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.58B | $6.53B |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | 22.2% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $77.93B | $61.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46.89B | $46.25B |
USB vs PNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Bancorp (USB) | 100 | 156.4 | +56.4% |
| The PNC Financial S… (PNC) | 100 | 194.3 | +94.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USB vs PNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.01
- PEG 1.28 vs PNC's 3.14
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 12.0x), PEG 1.28 vs 3.14
PNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.6%, EPS growth 7.4%
- 216.9% 10Y total return vs USB's 73.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, current ratio 0.15x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.6% NII/revenue growth vs USB's 0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 12.0x), PEG 1.28 vs 3.14 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs USB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs USB's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.1% vs PNC's +37.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs USB's 0.4% |
USB vs PNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
USB vs PNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USB leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USB and PNC operate at a comparable scale, with $42.9B and $33.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.7% (USB) to 17.5% (PNC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42.9B | $33.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.3B | $8.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.6B | $6.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.1B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +59.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +17.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.8% | +24.6% |
Valuation Metrics
USB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 25% valuation discount to PNC's 16.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), USB offers better value at 1.41x vs PNC's 4.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $86.5B | $89.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $117.5B | $105.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.06x | 16.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.93x | 12.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.41x | 4.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.42x | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.02x | 2.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
USB delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for PNC. PNC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USB's 1.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNC scores 7/9 vs USB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.19x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31.0B | $15.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46.9B | $46.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77.9B | $61.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.66x | 0.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PNC five years ago would be worth $12,963 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,811 for USB. Over the past 12 months, USB leads with a +39.1% total return vs PNC's +37.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PNC at 27.5% vs USB's 26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.1% | +37.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.4% | +107.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.1% | +29.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.6% | +216.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.1% | +27.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — USB and PNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USB's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.19 | $243.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.89 | $163.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.1M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates USB as "Hold" and PNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.8% upside for USB (target: $64) vs 14.0% for PNC (target: $253). PNC is the only dividend payer here at 2.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.82 | $252.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 49 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% |
USB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PNC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
USB vs PNC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USB or PNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the stronger pick with 5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate U. S. Bancorp (USB) a "Hold" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USB or PNC?
On trailing P/E, U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. at 16. 1x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: U. S. Bancorp wins at 1. 28x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 14x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USB or PNC?
Over the past 5 years, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) delivered a total return of +29. 6%, compared to +8. 1% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PNC returned +216. 9% versus USB's +73. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USB or PNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning USB is approximately 5% more volatile than PNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 113% versus 119% for U. S. Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USB or PNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is pulling ahead at 5. 6% versus 0. 3% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: U. S. Bancorp grew EPS 21. 6% year-over-year, compared to 7. 4% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USB or PNC?
U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 7% net margin versus 17. 5% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USB leads at 22. 2% versus 21. 5% for PNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USB or PNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, U. S. Bancorp (USB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 14x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, U. S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USB: 14. 8% to $63. 82.
08Which pays a better dividend — USB or PNC?
In this comparison, PNC (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is USB or PNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96), 2. 9% yield, +216. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PNC: +216. 9%, USB: +73. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USB and PNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PNC pays a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.