Travel Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
VIK vs CCL vs RCL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Travel Services
VIK vs CCL vs RCL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Leisure | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $27.18B | $34.03B | $77.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.50B | $26.62B | $18.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.15B | $2.76B | $4.48B |
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | 37.4% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | 16.8% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.9x | 12.5x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $5.74B | $27.99B | $22.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.80B | $1.93B | $825M |
VIK vs CCL vs RCL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) | 100 | 274.0 | +174.0% |
| Carnival Corporatio… (CCL) | 100 | 182.5 | +82.5% |
| Royal Caribbean Cru… (RCL) | 100 | 194.4 | +94.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VIK vs CCL vs RCL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VIK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 7.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.0%
- Beta 1.85, current ratio 0.79x
- 21.9% revenue growth vs CCL's 6.4%
CCL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (12.5x vs 16.8x)
RCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 0.3%
- 304.9% 10Y total return vs VIK's 229.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, current ratio 0.18x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.9% revenue growth vs CCL's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.4% margin vs CCL's 10.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs CCL's 2.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.0% vs RCL's +29.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs CCL's 5.3%, ROIC 12.2% vs 8.9% |
VIK vs CCL vs RCL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VIK vs CCL vs RCL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VIK and RCL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.6B annually — 4.1x VIK's $6.5B. RCL is the more profitable business, keeping 24.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCL's 10.4%. On growth, VIK holds the edge at +27.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.5B | $26.6B | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $7.3B | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $2.8B | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $2.6B | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.0% | +37.4% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +16.8% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +10.4% | +24.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +9.8% | +7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.8% | +6.6% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +179.2% | +82.4% | +28.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CCL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, CCL trades at a 59% valuation discount to VIK's 33.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCL's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VIK's 16.3x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.2B | $34.0B | $77.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.1B | $60.1B | $99.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.48x | 13.62x | 18.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.87x | 12.47x | 16.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.30x | 8.26x | 15.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.18x | 1.28x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 34.26x | 3.14x | 7.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.86x | 13.05x | 62.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VIK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VIK delivers a 2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $22 for CCL. RCL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VIK's 5.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VIK scores 8/9 vs RCL's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +22.5% | +44.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.1% | +5.3% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +37.1% | +8.9% | +12.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.3% | +11.8% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.12x | 2.28x | 2.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $26.1B | $21.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $1.9B | $825M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $28.0B | $22.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.14x | 3.09x | 5.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCL five years ago would be worth $36,311 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,663 for CCL. Over the past 12 months, VIK leads with a +102.0% total return vs RCL's +29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCL at 55.2% vs CCL's 37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.1% | -10.5% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +102.0% | +41.7% | +29.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.7% | +160.8% | +274.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.7% | +6.6% | +263.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.7% | -29.4% | +304.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.8% | +37.6% | +55.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VIK and RCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCL is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCL's 2.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VIK currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs RCL's 78.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 2.27x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.00 | $34.03 | $366.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.88 | $19.22 | $223.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +80.9% | +78.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 44.3 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 26.9M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
RCL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VIK as "Buy", CCL as "Buy", RCL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for CCL (target: $36) vs -9.8% for VIK (target: $78). RCL is the only dividend payer here at 0.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $77.60 | $36.17 | $353.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 47 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
RCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). CCL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
VIK vs CCL vs RCL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VIK or CCL or RCL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) is the stronger pick with 21.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL). Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VIK or CCL or RCL?
On trailing P/E, Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) is the cheapest at 13.
6x versus Viking Holdings Ltd at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Carnival Corporation & plc is actually cheaper at 12. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VIK or CCL or RCL?
Over the past 5 years, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) delivered a total return of +263. 1%, compared to +6. 6% for Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCL returned +304. 9% versus CCL's -29. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VIK or CCL or RCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus Carnival Corporation & plc's 2. 27β — meaning CCL is approximately 34% more volatile than RCL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Viking Holdings Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VIK or CCL or RCL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) is pulling ahead at 21.
9% versus 6. 4% for Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viking Holdings Ltd grew EPS 756. 7% year-over-year, compared to 40. 3% for Carnival Corporation & plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCL leads at 29. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VIK or CCL or RCL?
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 8% net margin versus 10. 4% for Carnival Corporation & plc — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCL leads at 27. 4% versus 16. 8% for CCL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCL leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VIK or CCL or RCL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) trades at 12.
5x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for Viking Holdings Ltd — 13. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCL: 31. 4% to $36. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — VIK or CCL or RCL?
In this comparison, RCL (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. VIK, CCL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VIK or CCL or RCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+304. 9% 10Y return). Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCL: +304. 9%, CCL: -29. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VIK and CCL and RCL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VIK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CCL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RCL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.