Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
VIPS vs JD vs PDD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
VIPS vs JD vs PDD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $7.80B | $46.34B | $146.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $105.97B | $1.30T | $418.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.92B | $32.20B | $102.27B |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 12.7% | 56.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 1.3% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 1.4x | 1.2x |
| Total Debt | $3.25B | $89.77B | $10.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26.35B | $108.35B | $57.77B |
VIPS vs JD vs PDD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vipshop Holdings Li… (VIPS) | 100 | 83.4 | -16.6% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 55.5 | -44.5% |
| PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) | 100 | 147.7 | +47.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VIPS vs JD vs PDD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VIPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 7.8%, current ratio 1.26x
- PEG 0.04 vs JD's 0.05
JD plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
PDD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth 84.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.2%
- 270.0% 10Y total return vs JD's 48.4%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs VIPS's -3.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs VIPS's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 1.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.4% margin vs JD's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs PDD's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.6% vs PDD's -10.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.7% ROA vs JD's 4.6%, ROIC 40.3% vs 9.9% |
VIPS vs JD vs PDD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VIPS vs JD vs PDD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PDD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 12.3x VIPS's $106.0B. PDD is the more profitable business, keeping 24.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JD's 2.5%. On growth, JD holds the edge at +14.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $106.0B | $1.30T | $418.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.5B | $23.8B | $93.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.9B | $32.2B | $102.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $9.1B | $111.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +12.7% | +56.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +1.3% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +2.5% | +24.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +0.7% | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | +14.9% | +9.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.6% | -56.3% | +16.5% |
Valuation Metrics
JD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, VIPS trades at a 22% valuation discount to PDD's 8.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JD offers better value at 0.28x vs VIPS's 0.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.8B | $46.3B | $146.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $43.6B | $139.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.86x | 7.62x | 8.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.81x | 1.43x | 1.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | 0.28x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.83x | 6.38x | 8.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.27x | 2.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 1.01x | 3.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.53x | 7.12x | 8.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PDD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PDD delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $11 for JD. PDD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JD's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PDD scores 7/9 vs JD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.8% | +10.5% | +26.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.4% | +4.6% | +16.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +40.5% | +9.9% | +40.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.2% | +10.2% | +42.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.29x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23.1B | -$18.6B | -$47.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26.4B | $108.3B | $57.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.3B | $89.8B | $10.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 121.89x | 12.85x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PDD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PDD five years ago would be worth $8,123 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,870 for JD. Over the past 12 months, VIPS leads with a +7.6% total return vs PDD's -10.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PDD at 16.8% vs JD's -2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | +5.4% | -14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.6% | -8.8% | -10.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | -8.4% | +59.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.0% | -51.3% | -18.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +48.4% | +270.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | -2.9% | +16.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VIPS and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PDD's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JD currently trades 79.1% from its 52-week high vs VIPS's 68.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.04x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.08 | $38.08 | $139.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.36 | $24.51 | $95.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.6% | +79.1% | +70.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 53.5 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 10.1M | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
VIPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VIPS as "Buy", JD as "Buy", PDD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.8% upside for VIPS (target: $22) vs 9.1% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, VIPS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.18% vs JD's 2.62%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.80 | $32.86 | $142.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 45 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.12 | $5.37 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.3% | +8.2% | 0.0% |
PDD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
VIPS vs JD vs PDD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VIPS or JD or PDD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VIPS or JD or PDD?
On trailing P/E, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the cheapest at 6.
9x versus PDD Holdings Inc. at 8. 8x. On forward P/E, Vipshop Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Vipshop Holdings Limited wins at 0. 04x versus JD. com, Inc. 's 0. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VIPS or JD or PDD?
Over the past 5 years, PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) delivered a total return of -18. 8%, compared to -51. 3% for JD. com, Inc. (JD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PDD returned +270. 0% versus VIPS's +26. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VIPS or JD or PDD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus PDD Holdings Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning PDD is approximately 18% more volatile than VIPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 29% for JD. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VIPS or JD or PDD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -3. 9% for Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PDD Holdings Inc. grew EPS 84. 8% year-over-year, compared to -0. 5% for Vipshop Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, PDD leads at 61. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VIPS or JD or PDD?
PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 3. 6% for JD. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PDD leads at 27. 5% versus 3. 3% for JD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PDD leads at 60. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VIPS or JD or PDD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus JD. com, Inc. 's 0. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 1. 4x for JD. com, Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VIPS: 50. 8% to $21. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — VIPS or JD or PDD?
In this comparison, VIPS (3.
2% yield), JD (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PDD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VIPS or JD or PDD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIPS: +26. 6%, PDD: +270. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VIPS and JD and PDD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VIPS is a small-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PDD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. VIPS, JD pay a dividend while PDD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.