Software - Application
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
WK vs APPF vs PCOR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
WK vs APPF vs PCOR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2.93B | $6.02B | $7.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $926M | $995M | $1.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $152M | $-77M |
| Gross Margin | 79.4% | 63.2% | 79.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.3% | 17.1% | -7.1% |
| Forward P/E | 19.0x | 24.6x | 29.3x |
| Total Debt | $808M | $71M | $118M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $339M | $107M | $481M |
WK vs APPF vs PCOR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workiva Inc. (WK) | 100 | 54.3 | -45.7% |
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 123.9 | +23.9% |
| Procore Technologie… (PCOR) | 100 | 61.3 | -38.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WK vs APPF vs PCOR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.25
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth 52.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.0%
- Beta 0.25, current ratio 1.57x
APPF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs WK's 348.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 3.20x
- 15.3% margin vs PCOR's -5.6%
PCOR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -17.4% vs WK's -23.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs PCOR's 14.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.0x vs 29.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs PCOR's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs PCOR's 1.40 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -17.4% vs WK's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs PCOR's -3.7%, ROIC 22.4% vs -9.7% |
WK vs APPF vs PCOR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WK vs APPF vs PCOR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APPF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCOR and WK operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $926M in trailing revenue. APPF is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PCOR's -5.6%. On growth, APPF holds the edge at +20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $926M | $995M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $192M | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $152M | -$77M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $146M | $234M | $275M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.4% | +63.2% | +79.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +17.1% | -7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +15.3% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +23.5% | +20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.9% | +20.4% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +186.8% | +37.2% | +72.7% |
Valuation Metrics
WK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $6.0B | $8.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $6.0B | $7.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -109.64x | 43.09x | -79.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.01x | 24.56x | 29.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.06x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.31x | 6.33x | 6.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 11.19x | 6.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.22x | 25.18x | 37.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PCOR. PCOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APPF's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WK scores 6/9 vs PCOR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +30.9% | -6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +24.2% | -3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.0% | +22.4% | -9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.6% | +25.9% | -8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $469M | -$36M | -$362M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $339M | $107M | $481M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $808M | $71M | $118M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.03x | — | -43.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APPF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $12,779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,982 for WK. Over the past 12 months, PCOR leads with a -17.4% total return vs WK's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APPF at 6.6% vs WK's -16.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.9% | -27.4% | -24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.7% | -21.6% | -17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.6% | +21.3% | -4.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.2% | +27.8% | -39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +348.9% | +1247.1% | -39.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.4% | +6.6% | -1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WK and PCOR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WK is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PCOR's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCOR currently trades 64.3% from its 52-week high vs APPF's 51.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 0.71x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.10 | $326.04 | $82.32 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $49.44 | $142.72 | $46.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.1% | +51.3% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 60.6 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 910K | 350K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WK as "Buy", APPF as "Buy", PCOR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.4% upside for WK (target: $94) vs 27.8% for PCOR (target: $68).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $94.00 | $236.67 | $67.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 13 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +3.1% | +1.6% |
APPF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WK vs APPF vs PCOR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WK or APPF or PCOR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Workiva Inc.
(WK) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 8% for Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR). AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) offers the better valuation at 43. 1x trailing P/E (24. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Workiva Inc. (WK) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WK or APPF or PCOR?
On forward P/E, Workiva Inc.
is actually cheaper at 19. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WK or APPF or PCOR?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +27. 8%, compared to -40. 2% for Workiva Inc. (WK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1247% versus PCOR's -39. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WK or APPF or PCOR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Workiva Inc.
(WK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Procore Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning PCOR is approximately 453% more volatile than WK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 13% for AppFolio, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WK or APPF or PCOR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Workiva Inc.
(WK) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 14. 8% for Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Workiva Inc. grew EPS 52. 5% year-over-year, compared to -30. 1% for AppFolio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WK or APPF or PCOR?
AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 8% net margin versus -7. 6% for Procore Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APPF leads at 16. 1% versus -8. 9% for PCOR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WK leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WK or APPF or PCOR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Workiva Inc.
(WK) trades at 19. 0x forward P/E versus 29. 3x for Procore Technologies, Inc. — 10. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WK: 82. 4% to $94. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WK or APPF or PCOR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is WK or APPF or PCOR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1247% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1247%, PCOR: -39. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WK and APPF and PCOR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WK is a small-cap high-growth stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.