Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WLAC vs BFLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
WLAC vs BFLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $322M | $1.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $103M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-76M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -79.5% |
| Forward P/E | 2742.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $20M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $150M |
WLAC vs BFLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Willow Lane Acquisi… (WLAC) | 100 | 188.6 | +88.6% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 135.9 | +35.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WLAC vs BFLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WLAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.54
- 88.6% 10Y total return vs BFLY's -57.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 19.55x
BFLY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +94.5% vs WLAC's +85.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs BFLY's -73.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs BFLY's 3.28 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.5% vs WLAC's +85.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6% |
WLAC vs BFLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WLAC vs BFLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BFLY and WLAC operate at a comparable scale, with $103M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $103M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$618,741 | -$76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$940,670 | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +49.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -79.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -73.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -18.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +25.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WLAC and BFLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $322M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $321M | $979M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2742.65x | -13.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 11.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.59x | 5.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WLAC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WLAC delivers a 0.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.1% | -36.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -25.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -76.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | -39.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$130M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $20M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -71.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WLAC and BFLY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WLAC five years ago would be worth $18,857 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,490 for BFLY. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs WLAC's +85.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFLY at 26.2% vs WLAC's 23.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.9% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +85.4% | +94.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.6% | +100.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.6% | -65.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.6% | -57.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.5% | +26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WLAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WLAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WLAC currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs BFLY's 74.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 3.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.96 | $5.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.06 | $1.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.0% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 87.5 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 466K | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WLAC as "Buy" and BFLY as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WLAC leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Risk & Volatility. 2 categories are tied.
WLAC vs BFLY: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WLAC or BFLY a better buy right now?
Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.
(WLAC) offers the better valuation at 2742. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willow Lane Acquisition Corp. (WLAC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WLAC or BFLY?
Over the past 5 years, Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.
(WLAC) delivered a total return of +88. 6%, compared to -65. 1% for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLAC returned +88. 6% versus BFLY's -57. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WLAC or BFLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.
(WLAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 28β — meaning BFLY is approximately 502% more volatile than WLAC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — WLAC or BFLY?
Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.
(WLAC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WLAC leads at 0. 0% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BFLY leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — WLAC or BFLY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is WLAC or BFLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.
(WLAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54)). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WLAC: +88. 6%, BFLY: -57. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between WLAC and BFLY?
These companies operate in different sectors (WLAC (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WLAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.