Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WLAC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WLAC
Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$322M
5Y Perf.+90.4%
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.11B
5Y Perf.+33.3%
SONO
Sonos, Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.80B
5Y Perf.-1.4%
PSFE
Paysafe Limited

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • GB
Market Cap$485M
5Y Perf.-47.1%

WLAC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WLAC logoWLAC
BFLY logoBFLY
SONO logoSONO
PSFE logoPSFE
IndustryShell CompaniesMedical - DevicesConsumer ElectronicsInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$322M$1.11B$1.80B$485M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$103M$1.46B$1.70B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$-76M$-41M$-183M
Gross Margin49.2%44.8%52.4%
Operating Margin-79.5%2.0%5.6%
Forward P/E2742.6x47.3x4.3x
Total Debt$0.00$20M$60M$2.66B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$150M$175M$1.35B

WLAC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WLAC
BFLY
SONO
PSFE
StockDec 24May 26Return
Willow Lane Acquisi… (WLAC)100190.4+90.4%
Butterfly Network, … (BFLY)100133.3+33.3%
Sonos, Inc. (SONO)10098.6-1.4%
Paysafe Limited (PSFE)10052.9-47.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WLAC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WLAC leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Butterfly Network, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. PSFE also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WLAC
Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick

WLAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.54
  • 88.6% 10Y total return vs SONO's -25.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 19.55x
  • Beta 0.54, current ratio 19.55x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.
The Growth Play

BFLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
  • 19.0% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9%
  • +94.5% vs PSFE's -37.1%
Best for: growth exposure
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
The Secondary Option

SONO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
PSFE
Paysafe Limited
The Value Play

PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (4.3x vs 47.3x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBFLY logoBFLY19.0% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9%
ValuePSFE logoPSFELower P/E (4.3x vs 47.3x)
Quality / MarginsWLAC logoWLAC0.2% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
Stability / SafetyWLAC logoWLACBeta 0.54 vs BFLY's 3.28
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BFLY logoBFLY+94.5% vs PSFE's -37.1%
Efficiency (ROA)WLAC logoWLAC1.6% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%

WLAC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WLACWillow Lane Acquisition Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

BFLYButterfly Network, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
65.0%$63M
Software And Other Services
35.0%$34M
SONOSonos, Inc.
FY 2025
Sonos Speakers
77.7%$1.1B
Sonos System Products
17.3%$249M
Partner Products And Other Revenue
5.0%$72M
PSFEPaysafe Limited
FY 2025
Merchant Solutions
52.6%$905M
Digital Wallet Segments
47.4%$815M

WLAC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWLACLAGGINGSONO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — BFLY and SONO and PSFE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

PSFE and WLAC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. SONO is the more profitable business, keeping -2.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWLAC logoWLACWillow Lane Acqui…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe Limited
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$103M$1.5B$1.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$618,741-$76M$61M$371M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M-$76M-$41M-$183M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$940,670-$19M$118M$136M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.2%+44.8%+52.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-79.5%+2.0%+5.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-73.6%-2.8%-10.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-18.3%+8.1%+8.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.0%+8.4%+4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.0%-29.3%-183.3%
Evenly matched — BFLY and SONO and PSFE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SONO's 142.1x.

MetricWLAC logoWLACWillow Lane Acqui…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe Limited
Market CapShares × price$322M$1.1B$1.8B$485M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$321M$979M$1.7B$1.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS2742.65x-13.68x-29.20x-2.99x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.47.27x4.30x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple142.14x4.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.37x1.25x0.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.59x5.35x5.06x0.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.64x2.17x
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — WLAC and PSFE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

WLAC delivers a 0.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. BFLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SONO scores 4/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricWLAC logoWLACWillow Lane Acqui…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe Limited
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.1%-36.8%-10.4%-24.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%-25.6%-4.8%-3.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-76.8%-13.4%+3.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.1%-39.3%-9.9%+3.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93344
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.17x4.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M-$130M-$115M$1.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$150M$175M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$20M$60M$2.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-71.59x2587.88x0.84x
Evenly matched — WLAC and PSFE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — WLAC and BFLY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WLAC five years ago would be worth $18,857 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFLY at 26.2% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWLAC logoWLACWillow Lane Acqui…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe Limited
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+44.9%+13.1%-14.9%+17.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+85.4%+94.5%+66.0%-37.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.6%+100.9%-31.6%-34.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.6%-65.1%-60.4%-94.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.6%-57.2%-25.2%-92.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+23.5%+26.2%-11.9%-13.3%
Evenly matched — WLAC and BFLY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WLAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WLAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WLAC currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWLAC logoWLACWillow Lane Acqui…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe Limited
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.54x3.28x1.75x2.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.96$5.72$19.82$16.49
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.06$1.32$8.73$5.95
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.0%+74.1%+75.1%+56.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10087.546.256.165.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded466K6.4M1.3M361K
WLAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: WLAC as "Buy", BFLY as "Buy", SONO as "Buy", PSFE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.0% upside for SONO (target: $20) vs 6.5% for PSFE (target: $10).

MetricWLAC logoWLACWillow Lane Acqui…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.PSFE logoPSFEPaysafe Limited
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.42$19.50$10.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts17911
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.5%+20.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PSFE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). WLAC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.

Best OverallWillow Lane Acquisition Cor… (WLAC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WLAC vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WLAC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.

(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). Willow Lane Acquisition Corp. (WLAC) offers the better valuation at 2742. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willow Lane Acquisition Corp. (WLAC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WLAC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?

On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4.

3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WLAC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?

Over the past 5 years, Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.

(WLAC) delivered a total return of +88. 6%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLAC returned +88. 6% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WLAC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.

(WLAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 28β — meaning BFLY is approximately 502% more volatile than WLAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WLAC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.

(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Butterfly Network, Inc. grew EPS 8. 8% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFLY leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WLAC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?

Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.

(WLAC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSFE leads at 7. 2% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BFLY leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WLAC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.

3x forward P/E versus 47. 3x for Sonos, Inc. — 43. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SONO: 31. 0% to $19. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WLAC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is WLAC or BFLY or SONO or PSFE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Willow Lane Acquisition Corp.

(WLAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WLAC: +88. 6%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WLAC and BFLY and SONO and PSFE?

These companies operate in different sectors (WLAC (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare) and SONO (Technology) and PSFE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WLAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SONO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WLAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BFLY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SONO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PSFE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.