WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$12.25B
5Y Perf.+224.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
WMS vs FBIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-25.0%
WMS vs FBIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | WMS | FBIN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $12.25B | $4.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.99B | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $471M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 45.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.45B | $2.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $463M | $264M |
WMS vs FBIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
WMS
FBIN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Drainage S… (WMS) | 100 | 324.9 | +224.9% |
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMS vs FBIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WMS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick
WMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth -10.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs FBIN's -2.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Value Play
FBIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 23.7x)
- 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WMS's 0.4%
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WMS | 1.0% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 23.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | WMS | 15.7% margin vs FBIN's 5.8% |
| Stability / Safety | WMS | Beta 1.32 vs FBIN's 1.61, lower leverage |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WMS's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMS | +30.2% vs FBIN's -16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WMS | 11.4% ROA vs FBIN's 3.0%, ROIC 20.7% vs 8.1% |
WMS vs FBIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
WMS vs FBIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWMSLAGGINGFBIN
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
2leads
WMSAdvanced Drainage Sys…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FBINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WMS5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WMS8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WMS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WMS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
FBIN1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBIN and WMS operate at a comparable scale, with $3.4B and $3.0B in trailing revenue. WMS is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBIN's 5.8%. On growth, WMS holds the edge at +0.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WMSAdvanced Drainage… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $869M | $482M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $471M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $577M | $420M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +45.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | -106.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.4% | -2.0% |
WMS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 37% valuation discount to WMS's 25.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FBIN's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMS's 15.7x.
| Metric | WMSAdvanced Drainage… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.2B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.2B | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.01x | 15.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.71x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.74x | 10.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.22x | 1.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.89x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.23x | 12.77x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMS delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $8 for FBIN. WMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.88x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FBIN's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIN scores 7/9 vs WMS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | WMSAdvanced Drainage… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.2% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.7% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $982M | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $463M | $264M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.75x | 4.72x |
WMS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMS five years ago would be worth $12,716 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, WMS leads with a +30.2% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMS at 18.8% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WMSAdvanced Drainage… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | -22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.2% | -16.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.7% | -36.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.2% | -54.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +549.9% | -2.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | -13.9% |
WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMS is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMS currently trades 80.4% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WMSAdvanced Drainage… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $179.31 | $64.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $104.69 | $36.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +60.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 860K | 2.6M |
WMS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FBIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WMS as "Hold" and FBIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for FBIN (target: $60) vs 40.7% for WMS (target: $203). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs WMS's 0.44%.
| Metric | WMSAdvanced Drainage… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $202.67 | $59.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +5.3% |
FBIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
WMS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallAdvanced Drainage Systems, … (WMS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
WMS vs FBIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMS or FBIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is the stronger pick with 1. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMS or FBIN?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. at 25. 0x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMS or FBIN?
Over the past 5 years, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) delivered a total return of +27. 2%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMS returned +549. 9% versus FBIN's -2. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMS or FBIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 21% more volatile than WMS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 88% versus 107% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMS or FBIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is pulling ahead at 1. 0% versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. grew EPS -10. 7% year-over-year, compared to -34. 1% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMS leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMS or FBIN?
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus 6. 7% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMS leads at 22. 6% versus 11. 6% for FBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIN leads at 44. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMS or FBIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 23. 7x for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 53. 1% to $59. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMS or FBIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 4% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS).
09Is WMS or FBIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+549. 9% 10Y return). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMS: +549. 9%, FBIN: -2. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMS and FBIN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WMS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. FBIN pays a dividend while WMS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(WMS: 0.4% · FBIN: -106.4%)Net Margin>
%
(WMS: 15.7% · FBIN: 5.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(WMS: 25.0x · FBIN: 15.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.