XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$1.55B
5Y Perf.+87.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
XHR vs PK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$2.25B
5Y Perf.+13.8%
XHR vs PK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | XHR | PK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $2.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.08B | $2.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $67M | $-215M |
| Gross Margin | -5.8% | -4.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 50.3x | 24.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.43B | $4.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $140M | $232M |
XHR vs PK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
XHR
PK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xenia Hotels & Reso… (XHR) | 100 | 187.1 | +87.1% |
| Park Hotels & Resor… (PK) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XHR vs PK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: XHR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
XHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 3.3%
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 326.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
- 44.8% 10Y total return vs PK's -11.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
PK is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (24.4x vs 50.3x)
- 12.6% yield, vs XHR's 3.3%
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | XHR | 3.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2% |
| Value | PK | Lower P/E (24.4x vs 50.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | XHR | 6.2% margin vs PK's -8.5% |
| Stability / Safety | XHR | Beta 1.05 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage |
| Dividends | PK | 12.6% yield, vs XHR's 3.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | XHR | +54.1% vs PK's +21.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XHR | 2.4% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 3.2% vs 2.2% |
XHR vs PK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
XHR vs PK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLXHRLAGGINGPK
PKPark Hotels & Resorts…
2leads
XHRXenia Hotels & Resort…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PK4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PK5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
XHR9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
XHR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
XHR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PK is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 2.3x XHR's $1.1B. XHR is the more profitable business, keeping 6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PK's -8.5%. On growth, XHR holds the edge at +2.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $243M | $612M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $67M | -$215M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | -4.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | -8.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +17.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +117.2% |
PK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PK's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XHR's 12.0x.
| Metric | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.30x | -7.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 50.25x | 24.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.96x | 11.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 0.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 0.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.27x | 22.08x |
PK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XHR leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XHR delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PK. XHR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PK's 1.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XHR scores 7/9 vs PK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | -6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.2% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 1.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $140M | $232M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.79x | -0.01x |
XHR leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XHR five years ago would be worth $9,655 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,280 for PK. Over the past 12 months, XHR leads with a +54.1% total return vs PK's +21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XHR at 13.0% vs PK's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.4% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.1% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.1% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.4% | -27.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.8% | -11.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | +7.2% |
XHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XHR is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PK's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs PK's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.23 | $12.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.21 | $9.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.7% | +90.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 659K | 3.9M |
XHR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XHR and PK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XHR as "Hold" and PK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.8% upside for PK (target: $12) vs 1.0% for XHR (target: $17). For income investors, PK offers the higher dividend yield at 12.57% vs XHR's 3.31%.
| Metric | XHRXenia Hotels & Re… | PKPark Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $11.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +12.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $1.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | +2.0% |
Evenly matched — XHR and PK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
XHR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PK leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallXenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
XHR vs PK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XHR or PK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) is the stronger pick with 3. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (50. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XHR or PK?
On forward P/E, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
is actually cheaper at 24. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XHR or PK?
Over the past 5 years, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) delivered a total return of -3. 4%, compared to -27. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XHR returned +44. 8% versus PK's -11. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XHR or PK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning PK is approximately 26% more volatile than XHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 121% versus 138% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XHR or PK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) is pulling ahead at 3. 8% versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 326. 7% year-over-year, compared to -240. 6% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XHR leads at 2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XHR or PK?
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -11. 1% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XHR leads at 9. 9% versus 8. 9% for PK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PK leads at 2. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XHR or PK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
(PK) trades at 24. 4x forward P/E versus 50. 3x for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — 25. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PK: 2. 8% to $11. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — XHR or PK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) offers the highest yield at 12. 6%, versus 3. 3% for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR).
09Is XHR or PK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XHR: +44. 8%, PK: -11. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XHR and PK?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(XHR: 2.2% · PK: -1.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.