Insurance - Life
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AAME vs KFRC vs KELYA vs SNFCA vs MAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Financial - Mortgages
Staffing & Employment Services
AAME vs KFRC vs KELYA vs SNFCA vs MAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Financial - Mortgages | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $53M | $790M | $349M | $251M | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $208M | $1.33B | $3.09B | $344.59B | $17.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $35M | $-266M | $19M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 18.9% | 27.2% | 26.3% | — | 16.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 3.8% | -2.8% | — | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.0x | 11.0x | 7.9x | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $70M | $159M | $0.00 | $2.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $2M | $33M | $0.00 | $871M |
AAME vs KFRC vs KELYA vs SNFCA vs MAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic American C… (AAME) | 100 | 145.8 | +45.8% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
| Security National F… (SNFCA) | 100 | 190.0 | +90.0% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AAME vs KFRC vs KELYA vs SNFCA vs MAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AAME is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 37.9%, current ratio 8.84x
- Beta 0.40 vs MAN's 1.03, lower leverage
- +52.7% vs MAN's -17.0%
KFRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0%
Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SNFCA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 42K%, EPS growth 18.9%
- 209.4% 10Y total return vs KFRC's 195.5%
- 42K% NII/revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 8.3x)
MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42K% NII/revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 8.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.3% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs MAN's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.7% vs MAN's -17.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
AAME vs KFRC vs KELYA vs SNFCA vs MAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AAME vs KFRC vs KELYA vs SNFCA vs MAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 1 of 6 categories
SNFCA leads 1 • AAME leads 0 • KELYA leads 0 • MAN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AAME and KFRC and SNFCA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNFCA is the larger business by revenue, generating $344.6B annually — 1654.9x AAME's $208M. SNFCA is the more profitable business, keeping 9.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, AAME holds the edge at +20.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208M | $1.3B | $3.1B | $344.6B | $18.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $56M | -$54M | $27M | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $35M | -$266M | $19M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | $43M | $66M | $46M | -$161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +27.2% | +26.3% | — | +16.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +3.8% | -2.8% | — | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +2.6% | -8.6% | +9.3% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +3.3% | +2.1% | +12.7% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | +0.1% | -100.0% | — | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.1% | +2.2% | -2.1% | -36.7% | +36.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SNFCA and MAN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, SNFCA trades at a 64% valuation discount to KFRC's 22.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $53M | $790M | $349M | $251M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55M | $858M | $475M | $251M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.22x | 22.05x | -1.34x | 7.86x | -104.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.96x | 10.96x | — | 8.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.42x | — | — | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 0.59x | 0.08x | 0.00x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 6.17x | 0.35x | 0.00x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.50x | 16.88x | 3.06x | 0.01x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAME scores 5/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +27.2% | -24.6% | +5.3% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +9.2% | -11.3% | +1.2% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.6% | +19.1% | -4.0% | — | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.4% | +20.1% | -4.3% | — | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.56x | 0.16x | — | 1.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $68M | $126M | $0 | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $2M | $33M | $0 | $871M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $70M | $159M | $0 | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.08x | — | -12.07x | 6.24x | 1.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNFCA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNFCA five years ago would be worth $14,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,514 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, AAME leads with a +52.7% total return vs MAN's -17.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNFCA at 11.5% vs MAN's -18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.4% | +39.2% | +13.1% | +14.1% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.7% | +18.9% | -12.2% | -1.0% | -17.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.9% | -13.8% | -34.2% | +38.7% | -46.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.5% | -16.8% | -58.3% | +44.9% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.2% | +195.5% | -33.0% | +209.4% | -30.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.9% | -4.8% | -13.0% | +11.5% | -18.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AAME and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AAME is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAN's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs MAN's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.40x | 0.53x | 1.01x | 0.80x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.71 | $47.48 | $14.94 | $11.00 | $47.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.57 | $24.49 | $7.98 | $7.70 | $25.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.5% | +91.0% | +64.9% | +90.0% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 65.6 | 63.7 | 55.5 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 305K | 361K | 36K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFRC and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", MAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 24.5% for MAN (target: $38). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.71% vs AAME's 0.78%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $71.00 | $15.00 | — | $37.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 5 | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +3.6% | +3.2% | — | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $1.55 | $0.31 | — | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +6.4% | +3.5% | 0.0% | +2.7% |
KFRC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). SNFCA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
AAME vs KFRC vs KELYA vs SNFCA vs MAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AAME or KFRC or KELYA or SNFCA or MAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is the stronger pick with 42061% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5.
4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AAME or KFRC or KELYA or SNFCA or MAN?
On trailing P/E, Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is the cheapest at 7.
9x versus Kforce Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AAME or KFRC or KELYA or SNFCA or MAN?
Over the past 5 years, Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) delivered a total return of +44.
9%, compared to -64. 9% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNFCA returned +209. 4% versus AAME's -33. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AAME or KFRC or KELYA or SNFCA or MAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlantic American Corporation (AAME) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
40β versus ManpowerGroup Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning MAN is approximately 158% more volatile than AAME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AAME or KFRC or KELYA or SNFCA or MAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is pulling ahead at 42061% versus -5.
4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Security National Financial Corporation grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAME leads at -1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AAME or KFRC or KELYA or SNFCA or MAN?
Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
3% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KFRC leads at 3. 8% versus -2. 8% for AAME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFRC leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AAME or KFRC or KELYA or SNFCA or MAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AAME or KFRC or KELYA or SNFCA or MAN?
In this comparison, MAN (4.
7% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield), AAME (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SNFCA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AAME or KFRC or KELYA or SNFCA or MAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, SNFCA: +209. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AAME and KFRC and KELYA and SNFCA and MAN?
These companies operate in different sectors (AAME (Financial Services) and KFRC (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials) and SNFCA (Financial Services) and MAN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AAME is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SNFCA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. AAME, KFRC, KELYA, MAN pay a dividend while SNFCA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.