AAPL vs META

For growth investors, Meta Platforms, Inc.

(META) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apple Inc. (AAPL) a "Buy" — based on 110 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc.

(META) is the cheapest at 25. 8x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Meta Platforms, Inc. wins at 1. 08x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 87x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) delivered a total return of +125. 6%, compared to +93. 5% for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1155% versus META's +417. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning META is approximately 62% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meta Platforms, Inc.

(META) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apple Inc. grew EPS 22. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Meta Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, META leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Meta Platforms, Inc.

(META) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 1% net margin versus 26. 9% for Apple Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus 32. 0% for AAPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 08x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 87x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 33. 4x for Apple Inc. — 13. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for META: 35. 8% to $821. 80.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Apple Inc. (AAPL) offers the highest yield at 0. 4%, versus 0. 3% for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +1155% 10Y return). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1155%, META: +417. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (AAPL (Technology) and META (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.