ABEO vs DBVT vs KRYS vs ALKS

For growth investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Abeona Therapeutics Inc.

(ABEO) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 44. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) delivered a total return of +364. 0%, compared to -82. 5% for Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +27. 7% versus ABEO's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

00β versus Abeona Therapeutics Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning ABEO is approximately 33% more volatile than ALKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 16% for Abeona Therapeutics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Abeona Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 165. 2% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABEO leads at 60. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Abeona Therapeutics Inc.

(ABEO) is the more profitable company, earning 1223% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 1223% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -1536. 9% for ABEO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABEO: 188.

1% to $17. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRYS: +27. 7%, ABEO: -90. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ABEO is a small-cap deep-value stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.