Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ABEO vs DBVT vs KRYS vs ALKS vs RCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ABEO vs DBVT vs KRYS vs ALKS vs RCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $325M | $1690.08T | $9.01B | $5.83B | $396M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $0.00 | $417M | $1.56B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $71M | $-168M | $225M | $153M | $-209M |
| Gross Margin | 26.3% | — | 92.8% | 65.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.4% | — | 42.8% | 12.3% | — |
| Forward P/E | 5.8x | — | 39.4x | 24.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $25M | $22M | $9M | $70M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $194M | $496M | $1.12B | $78M |
ABEO vs DBVT vs KRYS vs ALKS vs RCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abeona Therapeutics… (ABEO) | 100 | 7.1 | -92.9% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 594.7 | +494.7% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABEO vs DBVT vs KRYS vs ALKS vs RCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABEO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 222.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 12.2% margin vs DBVT's 0.3%
- 35.8% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
DBVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KRYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 128.0%
- 27.7% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -12.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
- Beta 1.02, current ratio 9.95x
ALKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00
- Beta 1.00 vs ABEO's 1.33, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, RCKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 222.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs ABEO's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +122.9% vs RCKT's -48.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 35.8% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
ABEO vs DBVT vs KRYS vs ALKS vs RCKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ABEO vs DBVT vs KRYS vs ALKS vs RCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 2 • ABEO leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • RCKT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.2% (ABEO) to 9.8% (ALKS). On growth, KRYS holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $0 | $417M | $1.6B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$86M | -$112M | $185M | $212M | -$208M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $71M | -$168M | $225M | $153M | -$209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$84M | -$151M | $237M | $392M | -$180M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | — | +92.8% | +65.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.4% | — | +42.8% | +12.3% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | — | +53.9% | +9.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.5% | — | +56.9% | +25.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +31.9% | +28.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.5% | +91.5% | +52.5% | -4.1% | +25.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, ABEO trades at a 87% valuation discount to KRYS's 44.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALKS's 17.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRYS's 50.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $325M | $1690.08T | $9.0B | $5.8B | $396M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $271M | $1690.08T | $8.5B | $4.8B | $343M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.84x | -0.75x | 44.69x | 24.47x | -1.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 39.44x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 50.79x | 17.01x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 55.80x | — | 23.16x | 3.95x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.45x | 0.65x | 7.51x | 3.25x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 47.71x | 12.14x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABEO delivers a 53.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ABEO's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +53.2% | -130.2% | +19.3% | +8.8% | -70.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +35.8% | -89.0% | +17.6% | +5.4% | -59.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -89.8% | — | +18.0% | +18.9% | -62.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.4% | -145.7% | +14.8% | +14.2% | -58.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 0.04x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$53M | -$172M | -$487M | -$1.0B | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $194M | $496M | $1.1B | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25M | $22M | $9M | $70M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.23x | -189.82x | — | 32.30x | -41.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $46,397 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $837 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, KRYS leads with a +122.9% total return vs RCKT's -48.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 51.7% vs RCKT's -44.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.1% | +3.6% | +23.8% | +23.8% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.5% | +100.5% | +122.9% | +15.2% | -48.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.5% | +18.1% | +248.8% | +13.2% | -83.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | -68.3% | +364.0% | +61.7% | -91.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | -87.1% | +2773.2% | -12.0% | -91.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.5% | +5.7% | +51.7% | +4.2% | -44.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KRYS and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABEO's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRYS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.26x | 1.02x | 1.00x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.54 | $26.18 | $306.10 | $36.60 | $7.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.00 | $7.53 | $122.80 | $25.17 | $2.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.2% | +75.3% | +99.9% | +95.6% | +49.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 47.4 | 68.0 | 60.5 | 48.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 252K | 269K | 2.2M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ABEO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABEO as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 188.1% upside for ABEO (target: $17) vs 6.7% for KRYS (target: $326).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $46.33 | $326.20 | $46.00 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 15 | 17 | 28 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ALKS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ABEO vs DBVT vs KRYS vs ALKS vs RCKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABEO or DBVT or KRYS or ALKS or RCKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABEO or DBVT or KRYS or ALKS or RCKT?
On trailing P/E, Abeona Therapeutics Inc.
(ABEO) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 44. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABEO or DBVT or KRYS or ALKS or RCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) delivered a total return of +364. 0%, compared to -91. 6% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +27. 7% versus RCKT's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABEO or DBVT or KRYS or ALKS or RCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus Abeona Therapeutics Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning ABEO is approximately 33% more volatile than ALKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 16% for Abeona Therapeutics Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABEO or DBVT or KRYS or ALKS or RCKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Abeona Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 165. 2% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABEO leads at 60. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABEO or DBVT or KRYS or ALKS or RCKT?
Abeona Therapeutics Inc.
(ABEO) is the more profitable company, earning 1223% net margin versus 0. 0% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1223% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -1536. 9% for ABEO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABEO or DBVT or KRYS or ALKS or RCKT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABEO: 188.
1% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABEO or DBVT or KRYS or ALKS or RCKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ABEO or DBVT or KRYS or ALKS or RCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRYS: +27. 7%, ABEO: -90. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABEO and DBVT and KRYS and ALKS and RCKT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABEO is a small-cap deep-value stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.