Travel Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ABNB vs EXPE vs BKNG vs TRIP vs TCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
ABNB vs EXPE vs BKNG vs TRIP vs TCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $84.21B | $29.58B | $132.72B | $1.31B | $34.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.65B | $15.17B | $27.69B | $1.88B | $59.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.52B | $1.56B | $6.15B | $19M | $31.17B |
| Gross Margin | 82.9% | 88.8% | 100.0% | 66.2% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 14.7% | 34.3% | 3.7% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 28.3x | 13.0x | 16.3x | 7.7x | 1.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.07B | $6.67B | $19.29B | $1.24B | $40.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.56B | $6.98B | $17.20B | $1.03B | $48.44B |
ABNB vs EXPE vs BKNG vs TRIP vs TCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) | 100 | 190.9 | +90.9% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 192.3 | +92.3% |
| Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| Trip.com Group Limi… (TCOM) | 100 | 158.2 | +58.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABNB vs EXPE vs BKNG vs TRIP vs TCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABNB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EXPE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +52.8% vs TRIP's -21.8%
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.9%
- 250.7% 10Y total return vs EXPE's 130.6%
- PEG 0.10 vs TCOM's 0.11
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.33x
Among these 5 stocks, TRIP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 28.1%, current ratio 1.51x
- 19.7% revenue growth vs TRIP's 3.1%
- 52.2% margin vs TRIP's 1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs TRIP's 3.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.2% margin vs TRIP's 1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs TRIP's 1.90 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EXPE's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs TRIP's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs TRIP's 0.7% |
ABNB vs EXPE vs BKNG vs TRIP vs TCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ABNB vs EXPE vs BKNG vs TRIP vs TCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKNG leads in 1 of 6 categories
TCOM leads 1 • EXPE leads 1 • ABNB leads 0 • TRIP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.8B annually — 31.9x TRIP's $1.9B. TCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 52.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRIP's 1.0%. On growth, ABNB holds the edge at +17.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.6B | $15.2B | $27.7B | $1.9B | $59.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $3.1B | $10.2B | $166M | $16.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.5B | $1.6B | $6.2B | $19M | $31.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.5B | $4.9B | $9.0B | $198M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.9% | +88.8% | +100.0% | +66.2% | +80.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +14.7% | +34.3% | +3.7% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +10.3% | +22.2% | +1.0% | +52.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | +32.1% | +32.6% | +10.5% | +35.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.9% | +14.7% | +16.2% | -3.9% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +96.8% | +2.4% | -2.6% | +188.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TRIP and TCOM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, TCOM trades at a 60% valuation discount to TRIP's 36.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BKNG offers better value at 0.16x vs TCOM's 0.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84.2B | $29.6B | $132.7B | $1.3B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $79.7B | $29.3B | $134.8B | $1.5B | $33.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.85x | 25.77x | 25.87x | 36.23x | 14.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.35x | 13.02x | 16.32x | 7.66x | 1.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.16x | — | 0.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.33x | 10.22x | 13.41x | 8.77x | 15.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.88x | 2.01x | 4.93x | 0.69x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.67x | 13.10x | — | 2.28x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.12x | 9.51x | 14.61x | 8.02x | 12.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPE delivers a 68.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $3 for TRIP. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXPE's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCOM scores 7/9 vs TRIP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.2% | +68.7% | — | +2.9% | +18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.2% | +6.0% | +21.1% | +0.7% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +50.6% | +40.2% | — | +7.4% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.3% | +23.9% | +75.4% | +4.5% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 2.62x | — | 1.92x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4.5B | -$307M | $2.1B | $202M | -$8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.6B | $7.0B | $17.2B | $1.0B | $48.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.1B | $6.7B | $19.3B | $1.2B | $40.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 16.35x | 7.21x | 4.17x | 31.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXPE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKNG five years ago would be worth $18,762 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,542 for TRIP. Over the past 12 months, EXPE leads with a +52.8% total return vs TRIP's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXPE at 40.2% vs TRIP's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.6% | -10.5% | -19.4% | -23.3% | -28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.1% | +52.8% | -16.8% | -21.8% | -14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.8% | +175.6% | +65.4% | -30.5% | +61.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.1% | +46.9% | +87.6% | -74.6% | +36.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.9% | +130.6% | +250.7% | -76.7% | +24.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.8% | +40.2% | +18.3% | -11.4% | +17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABNB and BKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRIP's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.47x | 0.74x | 1.90x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $147.25 | $303.80 | $5129.83 | $20.16 | $78.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.81 | $148.55 | $150.62 | $9.01 | $48.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.4% | +83.2% | +3.3% | +55.7% | +67.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 50.2 | 42.4 | 52.5 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 1.9M | 8.7M | 3.4M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BKNG and TCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABNB as "Hold", EXPE as "Hold", BKNG as "Buy", TRIP as "Hold", TCOM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.5% upside for TCOM (target: $75) vs 3.5% for ABNB (target: $145). For income investors, BKNG offers the higher dividend yield at 0.89% vs EXPE's 0.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $145.44 | $272.35 | $231.72 | $13.56 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 75 | 71 | 56 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +0.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.52 | $1.53 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | +6.5% | +4.9% | +39.9% | +0.9% |
BKNG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TCOM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ABNB vs EXPE vs BKNG vs TRIP vs TCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABNB or EXPE or BKNG or TRIP or TCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) a "Buy" — based on 71 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABNB or EXPE or BKNG or TRIP or TCOM?
On trailing P/E, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Tripadvisor, Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Trip. com Group Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Booking Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 10x versus Trip. com Group Limited's 0. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABNB or EXPE or BKNG or TRIP or TCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) delivered a total return of +87. 6%, compared to -74. 6% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +250. 7% versus TRIP's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABNB or EXPE or BKNG or TRIP or TCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Tripadvisor, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning TRIP is approximately 156% more volatile than BKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 3% for Expedia Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABNB or EXPE or BKNG or TRIP or TCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tripadvisor, Inc. grew EPS 798. 6% year-over-year, compared to -4. 2% for Booking Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TCOM leads at 38. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABNB or EXPE or BKNG or TRIP or TCOM?
Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 0% net margin versus 2. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus 4. 2% for TRIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABNB or EXPE or BKNG or TRIP or TCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 10x versus Trip. com Group Limited's 0. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for Airbnb, Inc. — 26. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TCOM: 40. 5% to $75. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABNB or EXPE or BKNG or TRIP or TCOM?
In this comparison, BKNG (0.
9% yield), EXPE (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ABNB, TRIP, TCOM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ABNB or EXPE or BKNG or TRIP or TCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 9% yield, +250. 7% 10Y return). Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +250. 7%, TRIP: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABNB and EXPE and BKNG and TRIP and TCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TRIP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TCOM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. EXPE, BKNG pay a dividend while ABNB, TRIP, TCOM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.