Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ABP vs AGEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ABP vs AGEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $164K | $132M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $183K | $114M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $115K |
| Gross Margin | -55.2% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -79.5% | -17.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.9x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $3M |
ABP vs AGEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abpro Corporation (ABP) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 97.4 | -2.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABP vs AGEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.59
- Rev growth 50.0%, EPS growth 38.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.59, current ratio 0.19x
AGEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -94.3% 10Y total return vs ABP's -99.7%
- 0.1% margin vs ABP's -76.7%
- +27.1% vs ABP's -92.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.0% revenue growth vs AGEN's 10.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs ABP's -76.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.59 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.1% vs ABP's -92.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs ABP's -8.2% |
ABP vs AGEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ABP vs AGEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $114M annually — 624.0x ABP's $183,000. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABP's -76.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $183,000 | $114M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $115,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$159M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -55.2% | +35.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.5% | -17.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -76.7% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -74.5% | -139.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.2% | +85.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ABP and AGEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $163,525 | $132M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $641,525 | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | -1102.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.89x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs ABP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.2% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $478,000 | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.45x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGEN five years ago would be worth $611 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $30 for ABP. Over the past 12 months, AGEN leads with a +27.1% total return vs ABP's -92.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGEN at -51.0% vs ABP's -85.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -87.6% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.1% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -93.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -94.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -85.6% | -51.0% |
Risk & Volatility
AGEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABP is the less volatile stock with a 2.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AGEN currently trades 51.1% from its 52-week high vs ABP's 3.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.63x | 2.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.65 | $7.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.10 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.8% | +51.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 18.8 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 573K | 814K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
AGEN leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
ABP vs AGEN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABP or AGEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Abpro Corporation (ABP) is the stronger pick with 50.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Analysts rate Agenus Inc. (AGEN) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ABP or AGEN?
Over the past 5 years, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) delivered a total return of -93. 9%, compared to -99. 7% for Abpro Corporation (ABP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGEN returned -94. 2% versus ABP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ABP or AGEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 58β versus Abpro Corporation's 2. 63β — meaning ABP is approximately 2% more volatile than AGEN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ABP or AGEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Abpro Corporation (ABP) is pulling ahead at 50.
0% versus 10. 4% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 38. 4% for Abpro Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGEN leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ABP or AGEN?
Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -39. 5% for Abpro Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGEN leads at -18. 0% versus -54. 2% for ABP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABP leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ABP or AGEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ABP or AGEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Abpro Corporation (ABP) carries a higher beta of 2. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGEN: -94. 2%, ABP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ABP and AGEN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABP is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.