Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ABSI vs SDGR vs RXRX vs TWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ABSI vs SDGR vs RXRX vs TWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $894M | $992M | $1.46B | $3.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $255M | $66M | $409M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-118M | $-103M | $-560M | $-81M |
| Gross Margin | -13.4% | 55.3% | -34.4% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | -60.3% | -64.7% | -8.8% | -33.9% |
| Total Debt | $5M | $109M | $78M | $137M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $231M | $743M | $183M |
ABSI vs SDGR vs RXRX vs TWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absci Corporation (ABSI) | 100 | 20.2 | -79.8% |
| Schrödinger, Inc. (SDGR) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Recursion Pharmaceu… (RXRX) | 100 | 10.8 | -89.2% |
| Twist Bioscience Co… (TWST) | 100 | 47.6 | -52.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABSI vs SDGR vs RXRX vs TWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 6.57x
- Beta 2.82, current ratio 6.57x
- +116.2% vs SDGR's -44.0%
SDGR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 1.72
- Beta 1.72 vs RXRX's 3.18
RXRX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 14.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 26.9% revenue growth vs ABSI's -38.2%
TWST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 318.1% 10Y total return vs SDGR's -53.6%
- -19.8% margin vs ABSI's -73.1%
- -12.5% ROA vs ABSI's -54.7%, ROIC -26.9% vs -58.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.9% revenue growth vs ABSI's -38.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -19.8% margin vs ABSI's -73.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.72 vs RXRX's 3.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +116.2% vs SDGR's -44.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -12.5% ROA vs ABSI's -54.7%, ROIC -26.9% vs -58.0% |
ABSI vs SDGR vs RXRX vs TWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ABSI vs SDGR vs RXRX vs TWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TWST leads in 3 of 6 categories
ABSI leads 0 • SDGR leads 0 • RXRX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TWST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $409M annually — 252.6x ABSI's $2M. TWST is the more profitable business, keeping -19.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABSI's -73.1%. On growth, TWST holds the edge at +19.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $255M | $66M | $409M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$116M | -$159M | -$521M | -$115M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$118M | -$103M | -$560M | -$81M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | -$148M | -$326M | -$95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +55.3% | -34.4% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -60.3% | -64.7% | -8.8% | -33.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -73.1% | -40.6% | -8.4% | -19.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -60.8% | -58.2% | -4.9% | -23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -1.6% | -56.1% | +19.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | +1.2% | +56.0% | -7.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SDGR and RXRX and TWST each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $894M | $992M | $1.5B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $879M | $871M | $797M | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.85x | -9.42x | -2.27x | -45.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 319.22x | 3.88x | 19.58x | 9.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.15x | 2.68x | 1.29x | 7.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 79.66x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TWST leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TWST delivers a -17.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-17 in annual profit, vs $-64 for ABSI. ABSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SDGR's 0.30x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -63.6% | -30.8% | -54.3% | -17.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.7% | -15.3% | -40.6% | -12.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -58.0% | -39.4% | -95.8% | -26.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -65.9% | -28.6% | -50.1% | -24.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.30x | 0.07x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$121M | -$665M | -$46M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $231M | $743M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $109M | $78M | $137M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -865.97x | — | -336.46x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWST five years ago would be worth $5,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,179 for RXRX. Over the past 12 months, ABSI leads with a +116.2% total return vs SDGR's -44.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWST at 63.5% vs SDGR's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +59.3% | -26.1% | -22.1% | +80.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +116.2% | -44.0% | -22.0% | +78.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +304.9% | -52.1% | -41.6% | +336.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.4% | -80.6% | -88.2% | -49.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.4% | -53.6% | -81.8% | +318.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +59.4% | -21.8% | -16.4% | +63.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABSI and SDGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SDGR is the less volatile stock with a 1.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXRX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABSI currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs RXRX's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.82x | 1.72x | 3.18x | 2.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.24 | $27.63 | $7.18 | $66.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.24 | $10.95 | $2.80 | $23.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +48.1% | +45.5% | +88.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 83.6 | 59.8 | 49.5 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 1.3M | 12.5M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABSI as "Buy", SDGR as "Buy", RXRX as "Hold", TWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 236.4% upside for RXRX (target: $11) vs -15.4% for TWST (target: $50).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.16 | $18.00 | $11.00 | $49.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 | 10 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
TWST leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
ABSI vs SDGR vs RXRX vs TWST: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABSI or SDGR or RXRX or TWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RXRX) is the stronger pick with 26. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 2% for Absci Corporation (ABSI). Analysts rate Absci Corporation (ABSI) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ABSI or SDGR or RXRX or TWST?
Over the past 5 years, Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) delivered a total return of -49.
9%, compared to -88. 2% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWST returned +318. 1% versus RXRX's -81. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ABSI or SDGR or RXRX or TWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Schrödinger, Inc.
(SDGR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 72β versus Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning RXRX is approximately 84% more volatile than SDGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Absci Corporation (ABSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 30% for Schrödinger, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ABSI or SDGR or RXRX or TWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RXRX) is pulling ahead at 26. 9% versus -38. 2% for Absci Corporation (ABSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Twist Bioscience Corporation grew EPS 63. 9% year-over-year, compared to 10. 6% for Absci Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RXRX leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ABSI or SDGR or RXRX or TWST?
Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) is the more profitable company, earning -20.
6% net margin versus -41. 1% for Absci Corporation — meaning it keeps -20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TWST leads at -36. 2% versus -44. 5% for ABSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SDGR leads at 55. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ABSI or SDGR or RXRX or TWST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ABSI or SDGR or RXRX or TWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+318.
1% 10Y return). Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TWST: +318. 1%, RXRX: -81. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ABSI and SDGR and RXRX and TWST?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SDGR is a small-cap high-growth stock; RXRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; TWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.