Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ACCS vs IZEA vs DGLY vs PERI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Security & Protection Services
Internet Content & Information
ACCS vs IZEA vs DGLY vs PERI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information | Security & Protection Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $33M | $79M | $2M | $496M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $31M | $19M | $440M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $42K | $-11M | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | 76.5% | 48.1% | 25.2% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.9% | -6.0% | -68.3% | -3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | 1891.3x | — | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $9K | $9M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $51M | $454K | $91M |
ACCS vs IZEA vs DGLY vs PERI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS) | 100 | 95.0 | -5.0% |
| IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA) | 100 | 158.2 | +58.2% |
| Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) | 100 | 130.6 | +30.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACCS vs IZEA vs DGLY vs PERI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -1.9%, EPS growth 139.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.3%
- -1.9% revenue growth vs DGLY's -30.4%
- Better valuation composite
- 19.0% margin vs DGLY's -59.7%
IZEA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 6.44x
- Beta 0.40, current ratio 6.44x
- Beta 0.40 vs DGLY's 3.66
- +116.4% vs DGLY's -78.7%
DGLY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 3.66
PERI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 145.8% 10Y total return vs ACCS's 2.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.9% revenue growth vs DGLY's -30.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.0% margin vs DGLY's -59.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs DGLY's 3.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +116.4% vs DGLY's -78.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs DGLY's -42.8%, ROIC -3.5% vs -114.7% |
ACCS vs IZEA vs DGLY vs PERI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACCS vs IZEA vs DGLY vs PERI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACCS leads in 1 of 6 categories
PERI leads 1 • IZEA leads 1 • DGLY leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PERI is the larger business by revenue, generating $440M annually — 23.6x DGLY's $19M. ACCS is the more profitable business, keeping 19.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DGLY's -59.7%. On growth, ACCS holds the edge at +3.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $31M | $19M | $440M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | -$1M | -$11M | $3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $42,326 | -$11M | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $407,000 | $2M | -$11M | $39M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.5% | +48.1% | +25.2% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | -6.0% | -68.3% | -3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +0.1% | -59.7% | -1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +6.1% | -57.7% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | -44.9% | +0.3% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.0% | +76.0% | -84.5% | +72.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PERI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, ACCS trades at a 100% valuation discount to IZEA's 1891.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACCS's 27.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PERI's 109.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $79M | $2M | $496M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $28M | $11M | $447M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.65x | 1891.30x | -0.23x | -58.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 9.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.33x | — | — | 109.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 2.53x | 0.12x | 1.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.63x | — | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 60.76x | 32.48x | — | 12.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACCS and IZEA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACCS delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-136 for DGLY. IZEA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PERI's 0.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACCS scores 7/9 vs PERI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.0% | +0.1% | -136.3% | -1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | +0.1% | -42.8% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.5% | -124.5% | -114.7% | -1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.2% | -3.8% | -135.2% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.00x | — | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$51M | $8M | -$49M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $51M | $454,314 | $91M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $9,106 | $9M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.42x | -290.31x | -3.40x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IZEA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACCS five years ago would be worth $9,770 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for DGLY. Over the past 12 months, IZEA leads with a +116.4% total return vs DGLY's -78.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IZEA at 20.9% vs DGLY's -94.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.5% | -4.8% | +93.9% | +18.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.5% | +116.4% | -78.7% | +14.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.3% | +76.8% | -100.0% | -67.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.3% | -64.1% | -100.0% | -28.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.9% | -83.8% | -100.0% | +145.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.8% | +20.9% | -94.2% | -31.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACCS and PERI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACCS is the less volatile stock with a -0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DGLY's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PERI currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs DGLY's 17.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.30x | 0.40x | 3.66x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.35 | $5.86 | $7.49 | $11.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.51 | $1.90 | $0.60 | $8.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.6% | +74.2% | +17.1% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 62.6 | 42.6 | 61.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 62K | 161K | 320K |
Analyst Outlook
DGLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +14.4% |
ACCS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PERI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ACCS vs IZEA vs DGLY vs PERI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACCS or IZEA or DGLY or PERI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) is the stronger pick with -1. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 4% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACCS or IZEA or DGLY or PERI?
On trailing P/E, ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus IZEA Worldwide, Inc. at 1891. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACCS or IZEA or DGLY or PERI?
Over the past 5 years, ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) delivered a total return of -2. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PERI returned +145. 8% versus DGLY's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACCS or IZEA or DGLY or PERI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 30β versus Digital Ally, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning DGLY is approximately -1331% more volatile than ACCS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 6% for Perion Network Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACCS or IZEA or DGLY or PERI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) is pulling ahead at -1. 9% versus -30. 4% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCESS Newswire Inc. grew EPS 139. 4% year-over-year, compared to -176. 0% for Perion Network Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACCS leads at -1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACCS or IZEA or DGLY or PERI?
ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -101. 0% for Digital Ally, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PERI leads at -3. 1% versus -77. 4% for DGLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACCS leads at 76. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — ACCS or IZEA or DGLY or PERI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ACCS or IZEA or DGLY or PERI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 30)). Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACCS: +2. 9%, DGLY: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ACCS and IZEA and DGLY and PERI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACCS (Communication Services) and IZEA (Communication Services) and DGLY (Industrials) and PERI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACCS is a small-cap deep-value stock; IZEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DGLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 149%
- Net Margin > 11%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 20%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.