REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ACRE vs RC vs BXMT vs TRTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
ACRE vs RC vs BXMT vs TRTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $287M | $330M | $3.25B | $664M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $-9M | $1.54B | $264M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-902K | $-311M | $104M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 100.0% | 62.6% | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | 60.4% | — | 58.3% | 51.0% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | — | 12.1x | 8.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.05B | $6.04B | $16.16B | $3.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $144M | $453M | $88M |
ACRE vs RC vs BXMT vs TRTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ares Commercial Rea… (ACRE) | 100 | 70.1 | -29.9% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 34.8 | -65.2% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 81.8 | -18.2% |
| TPG RE Finance Trus… (TRTX) | 100 | 115.9 | +15.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACRE vs RC vs BXMT vs TRTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +41.3% vs RC's -47.0%
RC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 59.3% yield, vs TRTX's 13.3%
BXMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 52.6% 10Y total return vs ACRE's 45.0%
- Beta 0.74 vs RC's 1.17
TRTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 13.3%
- Rev growth 123.3%, EPS growth -26.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, current ratio 0.18x
- Beta 0.78, yield 13.3%, current ratio 0.18x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 123.3% FFO/revenue growth vs RC's -93.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs RC's -15.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs RC's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 59.3% yield, vs TRTX's 13.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.3% vs RC's -47.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs RC's -3.7% |
ACRE vs RC vs BXMT vs TRTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ACRE vs RC vs BXMT vs TRTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRTX leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACRE leads 1 • BXMT leads 1 • RC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT and RC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and -$9M in trailing revenue. TRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -15.9%. On growth, ACRE holds the edge at +60.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | -$9M | $1.5B | $264M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | -$95M | $948M | $144M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$902,000 | -$311M | $104M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $366M | $335M | $96M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.1% | +100.0% | +62.6% | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +60.4% | — | +58.3% | +51.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | -15.9% | +6.7% | +23.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | -187.2% | +21.8% | +36.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.8% | -69.8% | +4.0% | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.0% | -86.2% | — | +58.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, TRTX trades at a 50% valuation discount to BXMT's 30.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRTX's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACRE's 18.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $287M | $330M | $3.3B | $664M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $6.2B | $19.0B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -318.29x | -0.78x | 30.14x | 15.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.89x | — | 12.07x | 8.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.60x | — | 16.37x | 15.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.37x | 12.07x | 2.14x | 2.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 0.18x | 0.94x | 0.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.45x | — | 11.79x | 7.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRTX delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-17 for RC. ACRE carries lower financial leverage with a 2.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BXMT scores 6/9 vs RC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.2% | -16.6% | +2.9% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | -3.7% | +0.5% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | — | +4.3% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | — | +11.3% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.06x | 3.12x | 4.61x | 3.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | $5.9B | $15.7B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $144M | $453M | $88M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $6.0B | $16.2B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.95x | — | 1.11x | 1.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRTX five years ago would be worth $10,323 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,520 for RC. Over the past 12 months, ACRE leads with a +41.3% total return vs RC's -47.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRTX at 27.1% vs RC's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.5% | -4.2% | +1.4% | +0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.3% | -47.0% | +13.3% | +27.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.3% | -55.6% | +49.0% | +105.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.2% | -44.8% | -2.7% | +3.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.0% | +5.4% | +52.6% | -1.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.8% | -23.7% | +14.2% | +27.1% |
Risk & Volatility
BXMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BXMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs RC's 42.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.17x | 0.74x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.89 | $4.75 | $20.67 | $9.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.05 | $1.51 | $17.67 | $7.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.6% | +42.9% | +93.3% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 62.3 | 44.3 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 392K | 2.1M | 1.4M | 663K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RC and TRTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACRE as "Buy", RC as "Buy", BXMT as "Hold", TRTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for RC (target: $3) vs -4.2% for ACRE (target: $5). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 59.25% vs BXMT's 9.79%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $2.50 | — | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 16 | 18 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.6% | +59.3% | +9.8% | +13.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $1.21 | $1.89 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +24.9% | +3.4% | +3.8% |
TRTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ACRE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ACRE vs RC vs BXMT vs TRTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACRE or RC or BXMT or TRTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the stronger pick with 123. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -93. 0% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACRE or RC or BXMT or TRTX?
On trailing P/E, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 30. 1x. On forward P/E, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACRE or RC or BXMT or TRTX?
Over the past 5 years, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) delivered a total return of +3. 2%, compared to -44. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXMT returned +52. 6% versus TRTX's -1. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACRE or RC or BXMT or TRTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 58% more volatile than BXMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACRE or RC or BXMT or TRTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is pulling ahead at 123. 3% versus -93. 0% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to -217. 9% for Ready Capital Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BXMT leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACRE or RC or BXMT or TRTX?
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 1% net margin versus -1593. 0% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRTX leads at 73. 0% versus 0. 0% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACRE or RC or BXMT or TRTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RC: 22. 5% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACRE or RC or BXMT or TRTX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 59. 3%, versus 9. 8% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT).
09Is ACRE or RC or BXMT or TRTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 9. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BXMT: +52. 6%, RC: +5. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACRE and RC and BXMT and TRTX?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ACRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TRTX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.