Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ACTG vs VHC vs IDCC vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
ACTG vs VHC vs IDCC vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $454M | $54M | $7.18B | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $215M | $144K | $829M | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-18M | $366M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 104.9% | 80.2% | 83.4% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -18.7% | -177.4% | 49.6% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | 21.4x | — | 38.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $100M | $0.00 | $506M | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $307M | $16M | $739M | $547M |
ACTG vs VHC vs IDCC vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acacia Research Cor… (ACTG) | 100 | 181.7 | +81.7% |
| VirnetX Holding Corp (VHC) | 100 | 28.5 | -71.5% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 507.1 | +407.1% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 1814.3 | +1714.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACTG vs VHC vs IDCC vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACTG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 133.2%, EPS growth 161.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 68.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.2%, current ratio 9.18x
- Beta 0.76, current ratio 9.18x
- Better valuation composite
VHC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 31.4% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
IDCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 0.6%
- 436.7% 10Y total return vs VHC's 79.5%
- 44.2% margin vs VHC's -168.5%
- 0.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.4% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.2% margin vs VHC's -168.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs MARA's 3.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.3% vs MARA's -4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.7% ROA vs VHC's -40.9%, ROIC 40.9% vs -89.4% |
ACTG vs VHC vs IDCC vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACTG vs VHC vs IDCC vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDCC leads in 4 of 6 categories
ACTG leads 2 • VHC leads 0 • MARA leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 6299.3x VHC's $144,000. IDCC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VHC's -168.5%. On growth, VHC holds the edge at +28.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $215M | $144,000 | $829M | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$19M | $489M | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$18M | $366M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | -$15M | $580M | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +104.9% | +80.2% | +83.4% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.7% | -177.4% | +49.6% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | -168.5% | +44.2% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | -145.0% | +70.0% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.4% | +28.0% | -2.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -164.0% | -10.3% | -38.0% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACTG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.4x trailing earnings, ACTG trades at a 9% valuation discount to IDCC's 23.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACTG's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IDCC's 12.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $454M | $54M | $7.2B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $248M | $38M | $6.9B | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.39x | -2.53x | 23.62x | -3.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 38.81x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.98x | — | 12.91x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 333.23x | 8.61x | 5.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 2.05x | 8.73x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.75x | — | 13.58x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDCC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDCC delivers a 33.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-52 for VHC. ACTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACTG scores 9/9 vs VHC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.2% | -51.6% | +33.4% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.4% | -40.9% | +17.7% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | -89.4% | +40.9% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | -54.4% | +38.1% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | — | 0.46x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$206M | -$16M | -$233M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $307M | $16M | $739M | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $100M | $0 | $506M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.51x | — | 11.48x | 4.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IDCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $40,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,054 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, ACTG leads with a +53.3% total return vs MARA's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDCC at 52.1% vs ACTG's 6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.8% | -26.6% | -14.1% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.3% | +53.2% | +32.4% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.7% | +80.6% | +251.7% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.9% | +11.3% | +303.1% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.5% | +79.5% | +436.7% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | +21.8% | +52.1% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
ACTG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACTG is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MARA's 3.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACTG currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs VHC's 43.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 2.03x | 1.12x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.27 | $29.00 | $412.60 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.03 | $6.60 | $205.78 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.3% | +43.6% | +67.6% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 41.6 | 30.8 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 343K | 21K | 393K | 47.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IDCC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACTG as "Buy", IDCC as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.5% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). IDCC is the only dividend payer here at 0.63% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $425.00 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — | 16 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.76 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +1.0% |
IDCC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACTG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
ACTG vs VHC vs IDCC vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACTG or VHC or IDCC or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, VirnetX Holding Corp (VHC) is the stronger pick with 31.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) offers the better valuation at 21. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACTG or VHC or IDCC or MARA?
On trailing P/E, Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) is the cheapest at 21.
4x versus InterDigital, Inc. at 23. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACTG or VHC or IDCC or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) delivered a total return of +303. 1%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDCC returned +436. 7% versus MARA's -51. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACTG or VHC or IDCC or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 11β — meaning MARA is approximately 310% more volatile than ACTG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACTG or VHC or IDCC or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), VirnetX Holding Corp (VHC) is pulling ahead at 31.
4% versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Acacia Research Corporation grew EPS 161. 1% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACTG leads at 68. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACTG or VHC or IDCC or MARA?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus -168. 5% for VirnetX Holding Corp — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus -120. 0% for VHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACTG leads at 82. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACTG or VHC or IDCC or MARA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52.
5% to $425. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACTG or VHC or IDCC or MARA?
In this comparison, IDCC (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ACTG, VHC, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACTG or VHC or IDCC or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 0. 6% yield, +436. 7% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDCC: +436. 7%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACTG and VHC and IDCC and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACTG (Industrials) and VHC (Technology) and IDCC (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACTG is a small-cap high-growth stock; VHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. IDCC pays a dividend while ACTG, VHC, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.