Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AD vs UNIT vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
AD vs UNIT vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | REIT - Specialty | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $4.24B | $2.64B | $817M | $8.71B | $198.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.91B | $2.23B | $949M | $12.12B | $138.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $290M | $1.27B | $-170M | $-1.74B | $17.17B |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 47.1% | 32.4% | 35.2% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 21.2% | -7.9% | -2.6% | 21.2% |
| Forward P/E | 57.5x | 2.3x | — | — | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $10.02B | $2.93B | $17.71B | $200.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $134M | $205M | $1.00B | $19.05B |
AD vs UNIT vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (AD) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Uniti Group Inc. (UNIT) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Cogent Communicatio… (CCOI) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AD vs UNIT vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 46.1%
- 116.1% 10Y total return vs VZ's 41.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 0.42 vs LUMN's 2.74
UNIT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.5%, EPS growth 6.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
- 91.5% FFO/revenue growth vs AD's -95.7%
- Lower P/E (2.3x vs 9.5x)
- 56.8% margin vs CCOI's -17.9%
CCOI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.67, yield 19.2%, current ratio 2.04x
LUMN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +100.0% vs CCOI's -65.4%
Among these 5 stocks, VZ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.5% FFO/revenue growth vs AD's -95.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.3x vs 9.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 56.8% margin vs CCOI's -17.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 46.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs VZ's 5.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs CCOI's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.5% ROA vs CCOI's -5.4%, ROIC 5.2% vs -3.1% |
AD vs UNIT vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AD vs UNIT vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AD leads in 1 of 6 categories
UNIT leads 0 • CCOI leads 0 • LUMN leads 0 • VZ leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AD and UNIT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 145.7x CCOI's $949M. UNIT is the more profitable business, keeping 56.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCOI's -17.9%. On growth, UNIT holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $2.2B | $949M | $12.1B | $138.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $1.1B | $174M | $2.4B | $47.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $290M | $1.3B | -$170M | -$1.7B | $17.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | -$460M | -$208M | $5.4B | $19.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +47.1% | +32.4% | +35.2% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +21.2% | -7.9% | -2.6% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +56.8% | -17.9% | -14.3% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +137.8% | -20.6% | -21.9% | +44.9% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.8% | +2.1% | -3.2% | -8.9% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | -10.5% | +23.9% | 0.0% | -53.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AD and LUMN and VZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.3x trailing earnings, UNIT trades at a 85% valuation discount to AD's 14.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VZ's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CCOI's 21.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $2.6B | $817M | $8.7B | $198.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $12.5B | $3.5B | $25.4B | $380.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.81x | 2.28x | -4.29x | -4.83x | 11.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.55x | — | — | — | 9.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.02x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.99x | 21.30x | 9.91x | 7.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 26.00x | 1.18x | 0.84x | 0.70x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.67x | 7.79x | — | — | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.61x | — | — | 23.49x | 9.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AD and UNIT and VZ each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UNIT delivers a 3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CCOI. AD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UNIT's 26.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UNIT scores 5/9 vs CCOI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +3.4% | -2.3% | -79.4% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +14.5% | -5.4% | -5.3% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +5.2% | -3.1% | -0.8% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | +6.5% | -3.6% | -0.6% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 26.35x | — | — | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $9.9B | $2.7B | $16.7B | $181.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $134M | $205M | $1.0B | $19.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $10.0B | $2.9B | $17.7B | $200.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.74x | 0.79x | -0.52x | -1.12x | 4.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AD five years ago would be worth $22,625 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,236 for CCOI. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs CCOI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AD at 71.9% vs CCOI's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.3% | +62.8% | -20.8% | +10.0% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.0% | +53.8% | -65.4% | +100.0% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +407.9% | +96.3% | -60.0% | +267.8% | +45.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.2% | -20.5% | -57.6% | -28.8% | +2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.1% | -30.5% | +13.1% | -35.7% | +41.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +71.9% | +25.2% | -26.3% | +54.4% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UNIT and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UNIT currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs CCOI's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 1.79x | 1.67x | 2.74x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.17 | $12.18 | $55.24 | $11.95 | $51.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.03 | $5.30 | $14.82 | $3.37 | $10.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.3% | +91.3% | +29.5% | +70.8% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.9 | 57.9 | 34.3 | 73.4 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 188K | 2.4M | 1.2M | 12.5M | 24.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AD and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AD as "Buy", UNIT as "Hold", CCOI as "Hold", LUMN as "Hold", VZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 68.5% upside for CCOI (target: $28) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). For income investors, AD offers the higher dividend yield at 46.14% vs VZ's 5.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.50 | $11.00 | $27.50 | $7.08 | $51.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 13 | 32 | 28 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +46.1% | — | +19.2% | +0.0% | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $22.76 | — | $3.13 | $0.00 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AD leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Total Returns. 5 categories are tied.
AD vs UNIT vs CCOI vs LUMN vs VZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AD or UNIT or CCOI or LUMN or VZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uniti Group Inc.
(UNIT) is the stronger pick with 91. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. (AD). Uniti Group Inc. (UNIT) offers the better valuation at 2. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. (AD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AD or UNIT or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
On trailing P/E, Uniti Group Inc.
(UNIT) is the cheapest at 2. 3x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. at 14. 8x. On forward P/E, Verizon Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AD or UNIT or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
Over the past 5 years, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
(AD) delivered a total return of +126. 2%, compared to -57. 6% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AD returned +116. 1% versus LUMN's -35. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AD or UNIT or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately -2681% more volatile than VZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. (AD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 26% for Uniti Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AD or UNIT or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uniti Group Inc.
(UNIT) is pulling ahead at 91. 5% versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. (AD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. grew EPS 823. 9% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UNIT leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AD or UNIT or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
(AD) is the more profitable company, earning 178. 5% net margin versus -18. 7% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 178. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UNIT leads at 21. 2% versus -30. 2% for AD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LUMN leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AD or UNIT or CCOI or LUMN or VZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. — 48. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCOI: 68. 5% to $27. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AD or UNIT or CCOI or LUMN or VZ?
In this comparison, AD (46.
1% yield), CCOI (19. 2% yield), VZ (5. 8% yield) pay a dividend. UNIT, LUMN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AD or UNIT or CCOI or LUMN or VZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 11), 5. 8% yield). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VZ: +41. 6%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AD and UNIT and CCOI and LUMN and VZ?
These companies operate in different sectors (AD (Communication Services) and UNIT (Real Estate) and CCOI (Communication Services) and LUMN (Communication Services) and VZ (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AD is a small-cap deep-value stock; UNIT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCOI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VZ is a mid-cap deep-value stock. AD, CCOI, VZ pay a dividend while UNIT, LUMN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 9%
- Dividend Yield > 18.4%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Dividend Yield > 7.6%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.