Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ADV vs WPP vs OMC vs IPG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Advertising Agencies
Advertising Agencies
ADV vs WPP vs OMC vs IPG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Advertising Agencies | Advertising Agencies | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $583M | $4.05B | $23.87B | $8.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.59B | $29.03B | $19.82B | $10.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-243M | $584M | $63M | $552M |
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | 16.3% | 16.8% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 6.7% | 13.7% | 9.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x | 7.2x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $6.35B | $12.78B | $4.25B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $241M | $2.64B | $6.88B | $2.19B |
ADV vs WPP vs OMC vs IPG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advantage Solutions… (ADV) | 100 | 16.5 | -83.5% |
| WPP plc (WPP) | 100 | 49.6 | -50.4% |
| Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) | 100 | 140.4 | +40.4% |
| The Interpublic Gro… (IPG) | 100 | 150.0 | +50.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADV vs WPP vs OMC vs IPG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADV is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +36.7% vs WPP's -46.1%
WPP is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 14.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IPG's 5.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
OMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 10.1%, EPS growth -103.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 97.9%, current ratio 0.93x
- 10.1% revenue growth vs IPG's -1.8%
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 7.8x)
IPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 5.4%
- 45.7% 10Y total return vs OMC's 23.5%
- Beta 0.65, yield 5.4%, current ratio 1.09x
- 5.4% margin vs ADV's -6.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.1% revenue growth vs IPG's -1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 7.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs ADV's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs WPP's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IPG's 5.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.7% vs WPP's -46.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs ADV's -8.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs -7.3% |
ADV vs WPP vs OMC vs IPG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ADV vs WPP vs OMC vs IPG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WPP leads in 1 of 6 categories
IPG leads 1 • ADV leads 1 • OMC leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OMC and IPG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WPP is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.0B annually — 8.1x ADV's $3.6B. IPG is the more profitable business, keeping 5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ADV's -6.8%. On growth, OMC holds the edge at +69.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $29.0B | $19.8B | $10.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $96M | $2.6B | $3.1B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$243M | $584M | $63M | $552M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | $1.7B | $3.0B | $807M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +16.3% | +16.8% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +6.7% | +13.7% | +9.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +2.0% | +0.3% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +5.9% | +15.1% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | -7.8% | +69.2% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.2% | -78.9% | +40.7% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
WPP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, WPP trades at a 58% valuation discount to IPG's 13.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WPP's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OMC's 10.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $583M | $4.0B | $23.9B | $8.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $355M | $9.1B | $29.8B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.54x | 5.63x | -284.89x | 13.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.48x | 7.24x | 7.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 7.78x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.69x | 3.68x | 10.40x | 7.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 0.20x | 1.38x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 0.81x | 1.21x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.59x | 2.54x | 8.56x | 9.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IPG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WPP delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-40 for ADV. ADV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WPP's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IPG scores 8/9 vs OMC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.2% | +17.1% | +0.7% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.6% | +2.5% | +0.2% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.3% | +12.5% | +14.5% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.1% | +13.0% | +13.5% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 1.70x | 0.98x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$228M | $3.7B | $5.9B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $241M | $2.6B | $6.9B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $6.3B | $12.8B | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.80x | 2.37x | 2.51x | 4.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OMC five years ago would be worth $10,725 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,371 for ADV. Over the past 12 months, ADV leads with a +36.7% total return vs WPP's -46.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADV at 11.3% vs WPP's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +117.7% | -18.2% | -4.4% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.7% | -46.1% | +5.3% | +1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.8% | -54.3% | -7.0% | -23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.3% | -57.1% | +7.2% | -10.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.9% | -59.0% | +23.5% | +45.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.3% | -23.0% | -2.4% | -8.4% |
Risk & Volatility
OMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WPP's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OMC currently trades 88.2% from its 52-week high vs WPP's 45.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.08x | 0.60x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.75 | $40.95 | $87.17 | $28.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.82 | $14.81 | $66.33 | $22.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +45.8% | +88.2% | +86.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.4 | 63.3 | 50.1 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 72K | 616K | 4.3M | 81.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WPP and IPG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADV as "Hold", WPP as "Hold", OMC as "Hold", IPG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.8% upside for IPG (target: $37) vs -57.8% for ADV (target: $19). For income investors, WPP offers the higher dividend yield at 14.05% vs OMC's 3.49%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.75 | — | $93.67 | $36.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 13 | 34 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +14.0% | +3.5% | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 0 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.94 | $2.68 | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.8% | +3.0% | +2.6% |
WPP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). IPG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ADV vs WPP vs OMC vs IPG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADV or WPP or OMC or IPG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is the stronger pick with 10. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 8% for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG). WPP plc (WPP) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Advantage Solutions Inc. (ADV) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADV or WPP or OMC or IPG?
On trailing P/E, WPP plc (WPP) is the cheapest at 5.
6x versus The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Omnicom Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADV or WPP or OMC or IPG?
Over the past 5 years, Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) delivered a total return of +7. 2%, compared to -86. 3% for Advantage Solutions Inc. (ADV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IPG returned +45. 7% versus ADV's -82. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADV or WPP or OMC or IPG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus WPP plc's 1. 08β — meaning WPP is approximately 79% more volatile than OMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advantage Solutions Inc. (ADV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 170% for WPP plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADV or WPP or OMC or IPG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is pulling ahead at 10. 1% versus -1. 8% for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WPP plc grew EPS 390. 0% year-over-year, compared to -103. 6% for Omnicom Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OMC leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADV or WPP or OMC or IPG?
The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus -6. 4% for Advantage Solutions Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMC leads at 15. 0% versus -3. 6% for ADV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OMC leads at 17. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADV or WPP or OMC or IPG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 7. 8x for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPG: 48. 8% to $36. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADV or WPP or OMC or IPG?
In this comparison, WPP (14.
0% yield), IPG (5. 4% yield), OMC (3. 5% yield) pay a dividend. ADV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ADV or WPP or OMC or IPG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMC: +23. 5%, ADV: -82. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADV and WPP and OMC and IPG?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ADV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WPP is a small-cap deep-value stock; OMC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IPG is a small-cap deep-value stock. WPP, OMC, IPG pay a dividend while ADV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 34%
- Dividend Yield > 1.3%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare ADV vs ACNB
ACNB is one of the most direct listed alternatives to ADV.
Compare WPP vs HURN
HURN overlaps with WPP in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Add CODA to This Comparison
CODA is the strongest missing peer across the current compare set.