Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AEYE vs SPSC vs ALKT vs SHOP vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
AEYE vs SPSC vs ALKT vs SHOP vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $100M | $2.14B | $1.87B | $145.00B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40M | $762M | $472M | $12.37B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $91M | $-50M | $1.33B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 78.3% | 68.0% | 57.4% | 48.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -7.9% | 15.3% | -9.3% | 13.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.7x | 21.7x | 60.9x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $721K | $10M | $354M | $188M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $151M | $63M | $1.53B | $86.81B |
AEYE vs SPSC vs ALKT vs SHOP vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 32.0 | -68.0% |
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 156.4 | +56.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AEYE vs SPSC vs ALKT vs SHOP vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AEYE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.29
SPSC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 1.74x
- PEG 0.89 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 1.74x
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.89 vs 1.24
ALKT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -12.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.5%
- 32.9% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4%
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 12.2% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
- +43.7% vs SPSC's -59.7%
- 11.5% ROA vs AEYE's -9.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -42.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.89 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs SHOP's 2.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs SPSC's -59.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs AEYE's -9.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs -42.4% |
AEYE vs SPSC vs ALKT vs SHOP vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AEYE vs SPSC vs ALKT vs SHOP vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPSC leads 1 • AEYE leads 0 • ALKT leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SPSC and AMZN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 18426.1x AEYE's $40M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40M | $762M | $472M | $12.4B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$504,000 | $162M | -$12M | $1.7B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $91M | -$50M | $1.3B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $167M | $44M | $2.1B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.3% | +68.0% | +57.4% | +48.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +15.3% | -9.3% | +13.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +11.9% | -10.6% | +10.8% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +21.9% | +9.4% | +17.2% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +5.8% | +28.9% | +34.3% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.0% | -8.6% | -22.7% | +15.1% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SPSC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.2x trailing earnings, SPSC trades at a 80% valuation discount to SHOP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $100M | $2.1B | $1.9B | $145.0B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $96M | $2.0B | $2.2B | $143.7B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -32.36x | 23.24x | -37.89x | 118.87x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.73x | 21.69x | 60.91x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.62x | — | 4.06x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.30x | — | 95.83x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.49x | 2.84x | 4.20x | 12.55x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.91x | 2.23x | 5.00x | 10.82x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.04x | 45.09x | 72.25x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-48 for AEYE. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPSC scores 6/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.8% | +9.5% | -14.0% | +10.5% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.5% | +7.9% | -5.9% | +9.0% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.4% | +12.2% | -8.6% | +9.4% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.7% | +12.5% | -9.3% | +11.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.01x | 0.98x | 0.01x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$141M | $290M | -$1.3B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $151M | $63M | $1.5B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $721,000 | $10M | $354M | $188M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.79x | — | -3.73x | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,977 for AEYE. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs SPSC's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SPSC's -28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.7% | -35.0% | -23.1% | -28.9% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.9% | -59.7% | -37.8% | +18.2% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | -62.6% | +41.1% | +73.6% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.2% | -41.9% | -54.9% | +0.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.2% | +119.8% | -59.5% | +4123.0% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.4% | -28.0% | +12.2% | +20.2% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPSC and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPSC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SPSC's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.29x | 1.03x | 1.30x | 2.64x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.39 | $153.16 | $31.66 | $182.19 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.31 | $50.56 | $14.11 | $88.14 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.4% | +37.3% | +55.1% | +61.3% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 46.9 | 50.9 | 34.7 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 194K | 605K | 1.9M | 8.7M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPSC as "Hold", ALKT as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.71 | $22.00 | $164.75 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 12 | 63 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SPSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AEYE vs SPSC vs ALKT vs SHOP vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AEYE or SPSC or ALKT or SHOP or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AEYE or SPSC or ALKT or SHOP or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus Shopify Inc. at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SPS Commerce, Inc. wins at 0. 89x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AEYE or SPSC or ALKT or SHOP or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -60. 2% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus ALKT's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AEYE or SPSC or ALKT or SHOP or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 156% more volatile than SPSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AEYE or SPSC or ALKT or SHOP or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AudioEye, Inc. grew EPS 30. 6% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AEYE or SPSC or ALKT or SHOP or AMZN?
SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPSC leads at 15. 7% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AEYE or SPSC or ALKT or SHOP or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 89x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 48. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — AEYE or SPSC or ALKT or SHOP or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AEYE or SPSC or ALKT or SHOP or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +119. 8% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPSC: +119. 8%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AEYE and SPSC and ALKT and SHOP and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (AEYE (Technology) and SPSC (Technology) and ALKT (Technology) and SHOP (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.